Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41398548›Full record

SynthesisInternal and emergency medicine2026

Supporting emergency departments workers well-being: a systematic review of the literature on interventions.

Benedetta Colaiacovo, Elisa Suardi, Marica Ceruti, Chiara Corvino, Luca P Vecchio, Mara Gorli, Francesca Gianni, Barbara Muzzulini

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Internal and emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Benedetta ColaiacovoDepartment of Psychology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Milan, Italy. benedetta.colaiacovo@unicatt.it.ORCID 0000-0002-1171-4813
Elisa SuardiDepartment of Psychology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Milan, Italy.
Marica CerutiDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Chiara CorvinoDepartment of Psychology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Milan, Italy.
Luca P VecchioDepartment of Psychology, University of Milan - Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Mara GorliDepartment of Psychology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Milan, Italy.
Francesca GianniEmergency Department, IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Barbara MuzzuliniDepartment of Psychology, University of Milan - Bicocca, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emergency departments (EDs) are high-pressure environments where healthcare workers face ongoing acute and chronic stressors, increasing the risk of burnout, anxiety, and depression. These challenges affect staff well-being, job satisfaction, and patient care. Although various interventions have been developed to improve well-being, their effectiveness remains insufficiently understood. This systematic review aims to examine interventions targeting the well-being of ED healthcare workers, focusing on individual, group, and organizational-level strategies. Following the PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search was conducted across four databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science) to identify peer-reviewed studies published between 2021 and 2024. A total of 26 articles met inclusion criteria, each evaluating well-being interventions for ED staff. Studies were categorized by intervention type-individual, group, organizational, or multilevel-and outcomes assessed. Most interventions targeted the individual level (n = 21), including mindfulness training, resilience programs, and educational approaches. Fewer studies addressed group (n = 1), organizational (n = 2), or multilevel (n = 2) interventions. Eighteen studies reported improvements in at least one well-being outcome, most commonly reductions in stress and burnout. However, only six included long-term follow-up. Overall, interventions in ED settings primarily focus on individual-level strategies and demonstrate short-term benefits. Less frequent multilevel approaches may provide more sustainable improvements. Future research should emphasize longer follow-up periods, robust study designs, and context-specific implementation to better assess and enhance the effectiveness of well-being interventions for ED healthcare workers.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalHealth PersonnelBurnout, ProfessionalHumansJob SatisfactionBurnoutEmergency departmentHealthcare workersInterventionMindfulnessResilienceSystematic reviewWell-being

Identifiers

PMID41398548
PMCPMC13061765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.