Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41398538›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2025

Resting after learning or repeating the learned?

Markus Martini, Tom Mercer, Luis Gutmann, Stephan Frederic Dahm, Robert Marhenke, Pierre Sachse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Markus MartiniDepartment of Psychology, University of Innsbruck, Universitätsstraße 5-7, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria. markus.martini@uibk.ac.at.
Tom MercerSchool of Education and Psychology, University of Wolverhampton, Wulfruna Street, Wolverhampton, West Midlands, WV1 1LY, UK.
Luis GutmannDepartment of Information Systems, University of Innsbruck, Universitätsstraße 15, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Stephan Frederic DahmDepartment of Psychology, University of Innsbruck, Universitätsstraße 5-7, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Robert MarhenkeDepartment of Psychology, University of Innsbruck, Universitätsstraße 5-7, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Pierre SachseDepartment of Psychology, University of Innsbruck, Universitätsstraße 5-7, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The formation of new memories can be influenced by the activities that immediately follow learning. Previous research has shown that several minutes of wakeful resting after learning can enhance memory retention compared to engaging in unrelated tasks, likely by facilitating memory consolidation. However, the relative efficacy of wakeful resting compared to other potentially memory-enhancing post-learning activities, like post-learning repetition, remains unclear. We conducted two experiments examining the effects of wakeful resting and repetition on memory retention. Participants studied three auditorily presented word lists. Each word list was immediately followed by one of three 7-min post-learning interventions: (1) repetitive listening to the word list, (2) wakeful resting, or (3) engaging in a new task. Across both experiments, memory performance was highest in the repetition condition, followed by the wakeful resting condition, with the lowest performance observed in the distraction condition. These findings were observed 12 min after acquisition and remained stable after 1 day. Our results highlight the differential effects of post-learning activities on memory retention. Wakeful resting is an effective and easy-to-implement strategy for facilitating memory consolidation, but in direct comparison, repetition appears to be even more effective for optimising memory retention.

Indexed as

LearningMemory ConsolidationRestRetention, PsychologyAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultMemory consolidationRepetitionSocial mediaWakeful resting

Identifiers

PMID41398538
PMCPMC12705850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.