ArticleAmino acids2025
Evaluation of the clinical characteristics and potentially prognostic factors in HER2-positive breast cancer.
Article in Amino acids, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
From January 2000 to December 2019, the SEER Plus Database collecting human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and hormone receptor (HR; including estrogen receptor [ER] and progesterone receptor [PR]) status for breast cancer (BC) cases. HER2-positive (HER2+) BC is an aggressive type, and HER2-targeted therapies have significantly improved the therapeutic outcome of patients. However, not every HER2+ BC patient achieves optimal benefits from current HER2-targeted therapies. Here, we conducted a detailed analysis to compare the demographic and clinic-pathological characteristics, survival, differential genes and mutations between HR+ and HR- in HER2+ BC patients. In this retrospective cohort study, Joint HR and HER2 status distributions by more than ten specific clinic-pathological characteristics were evaluated by using Pearson's chi-squared (χ2) test. The transciptome RNA-seqencing (RNA-seq) expression data together with detailed clinic-pathological information of HER2+ BC were from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and UCSC Xena. 30,482 (71.02%) patients were identified as HR+ /HER2+ BC and 12,440 (28.98%) patients were identified as HR-/HER2+ BC. HR+ /HER2+ BC patients were more likely to be younger than 50-year-old, white and infiltrating lobular carcinoma history than patients with HR-/HER2+. Patients with HR+ /HER2+ BC had lower risks of breast cancer-specific death and higher overall survival rates. Mast cells were enriched in the HR+ /HER2+ BC group, while plasma cells were more abundant in the HR-/HER2+ BC group.In conclusion, HER2+ BC patients benefit differently from current HER2-directed therapies, maybe partly due to the HR status and gene mutations, and they may provide potentially prognostic and predictive value and new treatment strategies for clinicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.