ArticleNPJ digital medicine2025
A randomized clinical trial of app cognitive behavior therapy vs. HealthWatch for obsessive compulsive disorder.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04136626 (Digital Health Interventions for Obsessive Compulsive Disorder), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Digital Health Interventions for Obsessive Compulsive Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
App-based cognitive behavioral therapy (app-CBT) addresses many treatment barriers. We randomized 120 U.S. adults with primary OCD (82.4% female, 77.5% White, mean age 40.1) between 7/2021 and 7/2023 to 12-weeks of coach-guided Perspectives (n = 60; app-CBT) or coach-guided HealthWatch (n = 60; an online well-being program). OCD severity (Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale; primary outcome) analyzed using a pre-registered mixed linear model showed a trend level group difference at post-treatment (ES = -0.47; p = 0.079). However, results from secondary and sensitivity analyses showed significantly better outcomes in Perspectives after adjusting for baseline differences or varying missing data assumptions (ps < 0.05). Response rates among completers were 65% in Perspectives and 41% in HealthWatch. Perspectives was also associated with greater pre-to-post-treatment improvement in functioning (ES = -0.55; p = 0.014). 83% of completers in Perspectives were mostly/very satisfied and 91% recommended the program vs. 43% and 53% in HealthWatch. Results highlight app-CBT as an effective and feasible treatment option for OCD that addresses dissemination obstacles.Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04136626 (Registration Date: 10/17/2019).
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.