ArticleScientific reports2025
Deep learning based thyroid prediction with opposition learning based red panda optimization feature selection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This research introduces a novel approach for thyroid prediction by considering three various publicly available datasets. The input data from the dataset is preprocessed to ensure standardization and balance for mitigating the biased outcomes. Then, the proposed cascaded autoencoder-based simple recurrent model is employed for extracting significant spatio-temporal features. From the extracted features, the optimal feature is selected using the proposed Opposition Learning-based Red Panda Optimization (OL_RPO) algorithm, which enhances the efficiency of the predictive model. Finally, the thyroid prediction is performed using the Enhanced Transformer Model, which uses the selected features to achieve robust and accurate predictions. The analysis of the proposed model based on Accuracy, Specificity, Sensitivity, F-Score, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and Error acquired the value of 99, 99.2, 99.01, 98.501, 98.1, 1.9, and 0.07689 respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.