ArticleScientific reports2025
Gender dynamics and remittances in the adoption of sustainable agricultural practices in Nepal.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Agricultural systems in rural Nepal face significant transformation due to climate change and shifting household labour dynamics. Male out-migration, a key but underexplored driver of this change, disrupts traditional gendered labor divisions and reshapes agricultural decision-making. In smallholder farms, traditionally, men are more responsible for tasks like ploughing and harvesting, whereas women take on planting, weeding, and winnowing roles. In the context of male out-migration, women must take primary responsibility for managing farms and households. However, persistent social and structural inequalities continue to constrain their decision-making authority. The feminisation of agriculture has important implications for adopting sustainable agricultural practices (SAPs). Using survey data from 400 households and Poisson regression analysis, this study examines the effects of migration, remittances, and female-managed farms on SAP adoption. Our results highlight that household farms having migrated member(s), receiving remittance and female-managed farms are more likely to adopt SAPs. In contrast, a higher number of out-migrating females negatively affects adoption, reflecting women's critical role in sustainable farming adoption. Their participation in women's groups, which provide training and financial resources and their management of tasks such as seed selection, winnowing, and organic pest control, are essential to SAP implementation. As such, our study provides a deeper understanding of the positive role of females in SAP adoption. We advocate for policies that recognising intersectional vulnerabilities, supporting women's groups, lead to increased adoption of sustainable agricultural practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.