Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41398401›Full record

ArticlePediatric research2026

Comparison of air displacement plethysmography, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and bioimpedance in 6-week-old and 6-month-old infants.

Jaz Lyons-Reid, José G B Derraik, Leigh C Ward, Mya-Thway Tint, Benjamin B Albert, Cathriona R Monnard, J Manuel Ramos Nieves, Timothy Kenealy, Keith M Godfrey, Shiao-Yng Chan and 1 more

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jaz Lyons-ReidLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
José G B DerraikDepartment of Paediatrics: Child and Youth Health, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Leigh C WardSchool of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Mya-Thway TintInstitute for Human Development and Potential, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore.
Benjamin B AlbertLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Cathriona R MonnardNestlé Institute of Health Sciences, Nestlé Research, Société des Produits Nestlé S.A., Lausanne, Switzerland.
J Manuel Ramos NievesNestlé Institute of Health Sciences, Nestlé Research, Société des Produits Nestlé S.A., Lausanne, Switzerland.
Timothy KenealyLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Keith M Godfrey *MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Shiao-Yng Chan *Institute for Human Development and Potential, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore.
Wayne S Cutfield *Liggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. w.cutfield@auckland.ac.nz.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

impactBody composition estimates in infancy differ substantially depending on the tool used (ADP, DXA, or BIA) and on within-tool factors (e.g. DXA software version). This study systematically compares three widely used infant body composition tools, demonstrating that the choice of tool and analysis approach can markedly affect the results. These findings underscore the need for caution when comparing infant body composition measurements across studies or over time where a change in tool type has been required. Standardized protocols and transparent reporting will be crucial for improving paediatric nutrition and growth assessments.

Indexed as

Absorptiometry, PhotonBody CompositionPlethysmographyElectric ImpedanceFemaleHumansInfantMale

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.