Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41398374›Full record

ArticleMolecular psychiatry2026

Ganglioside sialylation modulates tau internalization and pathology spread.

Shiying Li, Yuanyuan Chen, Tianling Song, Dong Liu, Ruozhen Wu, Xingyue Yang, Qian Wu, Leyi Lei, Xinyue Yu, Jing Zhang and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Shiying Li *Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Tissue Engineering and Neuroregeneration, Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Ministry of Education, Co-innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, NMPA Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Tissue Engineering Technology Products, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.
Yuanyuan Chen *Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Tissue Engineering and Neuroregeneration, Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Ministry of Education, Co-innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, NMPA Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Tissue Engineering Technology Products, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.
Tianling Song *Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Tissue Engineering and Neuroregeneration, Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Ministry of Education, Co-innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, NMPA Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Tissue Engineering Technology Products, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.
Dong LiuJiangsu Key Laboratory of Tissue Engineering and Neuroregeneration, Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Ministry of Education, Co-innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, NMPA Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Tissue Engineering Technology Products, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.
Ruozhen WuJiangsu Key Laboratory of Tissue Engineering and Neuroregeneration, Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Ministry of Education, Co-innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, NMPA Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Tissue Engineering Technology Products, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.
Xingyue YangDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.
Qian WuJiangsu Key Laboratory of Tissue Engineering and Neuroregeneration, Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Ministry of Education, Co-innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, NMPA Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Tissue Engineering Technology Products, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.
Leyi LeiDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.
Xinyue YuDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.
Jing ZhangJiangsu Key Laboratory of Tissue Engineering and Neuroregeneration, Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Ministry of Education, Co-innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, NMPA Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Tissue Engineering Technology Products, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.
Longfei LiJiangsu Key Laboratory of Tissue Engineering and Neuroregeneration, Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Ministry of Education, Co-innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, NMPA Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Tissue Engineering Technology Products, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.
Yanli JiangJiangsu Key Laboratory of Tissue Engineering and Neuroregeneration, Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Ministry of Education, Co-innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, NMPA Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Tissue Engineering Technology Products, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.
Jianlan GuDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Medicine, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7277-916X
Jin MiaoLaboratory of Animal Center, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.
Jin-Hua GuDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Affiliated Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.
Jianhua ShiInstitute for Translational Neuroscience of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Center for Neural Developmental and Degenerative Research of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.
Feng WuDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China. wf619@ntu.edu.cn.
Fei LiuDepartment of Neurochemistry, Inge Grundke-Iqbal Research Floor, New York State Institute for Basic Research in Developmental Disabilities, Staten Island, NY, USA. Fei.liu@opwdd.ny.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8601-4419
Dandan ChuJiangsu Key Laboratory of Tissue Engineering and Neuroregeneration, Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration of Ministry of Education, Co-innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, NMPA Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Tissue Engineering Technology Products, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China. chudd@ntu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5661-9051

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 31970968National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 81872853
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gangliosides serve as receptors for proteins, bacteria, and viruses, with sialylation at the termini of their glycan chains playing a crucial role in ligand recognition and endocytosis. The internalization of proteopathic tau aggregates by neurons is integral to the propagation of tau pathology in Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, the influence of gangliosides and their sialylation modifications on the uptake of proteopathic tau aggregates and the subsequent impact on AD pathology remains unclear. This study investigates the roles of the four mammalian sialidases (Neu1-Neu4) in modulating tau aggregation in cellular models. Our findings demonstrate that Neu3 significantly inhibits tau aggregation induced by proteopathic tau derived from the brains of AD patients (AD P-tau). Overexpressing Neu3 or administering ganglioside GM1, which results from Neu3-catalyzed removal of one sialic acid from GD1a, in the mouse model decreases the GD1a/GM1 ratio in mouse brain, effectively blocks the spread of tau pathology and improves recognition in AD P-tau-injected mice. Both Neu3 and GM1 reduce the internalization of tau aggregates, while GD1a enhances tau uptake, showing a positive correlation with the level of internalized tau. Moreover, the internalization of tau mediated by GD1a dependent on low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 (LRP1) and compensates for heparin-inhibited tau uptake. In vitro assays demonstrate that GD1a exhibits a higher binding avidity for tau filaments than GM1. These findings indicate that GD1a may directly bind to tau aggregates via the sialic acid moiety, facilitating LRP1-mediated tau uptake. This study proposes a novel mechanism for tau internalization and posits that reducing ganglioside sialylation may be a promising strategy for hindering the spread of tau pathology in AD.

Indexed as

Gangliosidestau ProteinsAlzheimer DiseaseAnimalsBrainDisease Models, AnimalEndocytosisG(M1) GangliosideHumansLow Density Lipoprotein Receptor-Related Protein-1MaleMiceMice, TransgenicN-Acetylneuraminic AcidNeuraminidaseNeuronsGangliosidesG(M1) GangliosideLow Density Lipoprotein Receptor-Related Protein-1N-Acetylneuraminic AcidNeu3 protein, humanNeu3 protein, mouseNeuraminidasetau Proteins

Identifiers

PMID41398374
PMCPMC13099399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.