Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41398355›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Effect of short dentin etching and water storage on bonding of resin composite to dentin with universal and two-step self-etch adhesive systems.

Basma Ahmed, Omar Abd El-Maksoud, Ramy Ahmed Wafaie, Salah Hasab Mahmoud

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Basma AhmedConservative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Delta University for Science and Technology, Gamasa, 35712, Egypt.
Omar Abd El-MaksoudConservative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Delta University for Science and Technology, Gamasa, 35712, Egypt.
Ramy Ahmed WafaieConservative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Delta University for Science and Technology, Gamasa, 35712, Egypt. Ramy.Taher@deltauniv.edu.eg.
Salah Hasab MahmoudOperative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate the effect of short dentin etching and 6-month water storage on the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of universal and two-step self-etch adhesives to dentin. Mid-coronal dentin specimens obtained from 56 third molars were assigned into two groups according to the adhesive type (n = 28); universal adhesive (Scotchbond Universal Plus Adhesive, 3 M Oral Care) and two-step self-etch adhesive (Clearfil SE Bond, Kuraray Noritake). Each group was further divided into two subgroups (n = 14) based on the application protocol: self-etch (SE) and etch-and-rinse with short dentin etching (E&R/SDE) for 3 s. After bonding and composite application, half of the specimens were stored in 37 ± 1 °C distilled water for 24 h (immediate), while the other half were stored for 6 months (aged). Thereafter, specimens were cut into 1 mm² beams using a slow-speed diamond saw under copious water cooling. The beams were then subjected to a tensile force at a cross-head speed of 0.5 mm/min in a universal testing machine until failure occurred. The µTBS was then calculated in megapascals (MPa) by dividing the load at failure by the cross-sectional area of each beam. The values of five beams were averaged to obtain one µTBS value per tooth, and accordingly, data were analyzed using three-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD post-hoc tests (p < 0.05). Failure modes were recorded. The application protocol and the storage time significantly influenced the µTBS results (p < 0.001). Regarding the application protocol, E&R/SDE for 3 s yielded significantly higher bond strength values than the SE for both adhesives (p < 0.05). In terms of storage-time, all groups exhibited a statistically significant reduction in bond strength after 6-month water storage (p < 0.05). On the contrary, no statistically significant difference was detected between the two adhesives irrespective of the application protocol or the storage time (p > 0.05). The predominant failure mode observed for immediate groups was mixed failure, while adhesive failure was the most frequently noted after 6 months. Despite the beneficial effect of E&R/SDE for 3 s in improving the bond strength of universal and 2-step self-etch adhesives to dentin, the 6-month water storage negatively affected the bonding performance of both adhesives.Clinical relevance: E&R/SDE enhanced μTBS at both storage times and may contribute to better bond stability, although all groups exhibited degradation after 6-month water storage, which necessitates further clinical validation.

Indexed as

Composite ResinsDental BondingDentinDentin-Bonding AgentsResin CementsWaterHumansMaterials TestingTensile StrengthClearfil SE BondComposite ResinsDentin-Bonding AgentsResin CementsWaterBond strengthSelf-etch adhesiveShort dentin etchingUniversal adhesiveWater storage

Identifiers

PMID41398355
PMCPMC12706046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.