Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41398333›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Triaxial test investigation of the reinforcement effect of Acacia dealbata roots on mountain red soil.

Xirui Dai, Zongheng Xu, Hongchen Ye, Yun Zeng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xirui DaiFaculty of Geography, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming, 650500, China.
Zongheng XuFaculty of Geography, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming, 650500, China. 140079@ynnu.edu.cn.
Hongchen YeFaculty of Geography, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming, 650500, China.
Yun ZengFaculty of Geography, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming, 650500, China.

Funding

Yunnan Natural Science Foundation Project 202401AT070119
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vegetation roots play a pivotal role in enhancing the shear resistance and stability of degraded mountain red soils, yet the quantitative effects of root density and orientation remain poorly constrained. In this study, unconsolidated undrained triaxial tests were conducted on red soil reinforced with Acacia dealbata roots to examine the influence of root area ratio (RAR), spatial arrangement, and confining pressure on stress-strain behaviour and shear strength. Shear strength parameters were derived from Mohr-Coulomb envelopes, and the increments in cohesion (Δc) and internal friction angle (Δφ) were analytically related to the increment of the major principal stress (Δσ₁). The results indicate that the presence of root systems enhanced both peak strength and the reinforcement index. The configuration with high RAR and horizontal root distribution achieved up to 64.80% higher deviator stress than the unreinforced control, whereas sparse vertical roots could weaken the composite under low confinement. Reinforcement efficiency was governed by the combined effects of root density and orientation, with dense, horizontally distributed networks most effectively mobilising interfacial friction and tensile resistance. Strength envelopes indicated simultaneous increases in apparent cohesion and internal friction angle, where Δc contributed nearly linearly to Δσ₁, while Δφ induced a quadratic amplification; their synergistic effect was further enhanced at higher confining pressures. This study provides robust experimental evidence and a quantitative framework to inform eco-engineering and slope stabilisation practices in mountain red soils, highlighting the importance of root system density and architecture in maximising vegetation-based reinforcement.

Indexed as

Mountain red soilRoot distribution and densityRoot–soil compositesShear strength parametersTriaxial shear test

Identifiers

PMID41398333
PMCPMC12706036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.