ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2025
Relationship between running demands in friendly match and aerobic-anaerobic field test results in youth soccer players.
Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundField test performance is a key indicator of soccer match performance, offering insights into aerobic and anaerobic capacities. This study investigated the relationship between field test performance and match performance in young soccer players.
methodsThirty-eight elite male soccer players (mean ± SD: age 17.1 ± 1.01 years; height 177.17 ± 5.38 cm; body mass 71.18 ± 5.60 kg) participated in the study. Aerobic endurance was evaluated using the Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Level 1 test (YIRT1), the 30-15 Intermittent Fitness Test (30-15
resultsSignificant positive correlations were observed between YIRT1 results and total match distance (r = .524-.546, p < 0.01), as well as high-intensity actions (r = .490-.518, p < 0.01). The 30-15
conclusionsIn conclusion, among the tests examined, YIRT1 emerged as the most consistent predictor of match-related running performance. While the 30-15
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.