Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41398276›Full record

ArticleJournal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine2025

Ethnomycological knowledge of Slavic immigrant descendants in southern Brazil.

Amanda Prado-Elias, Rafaela Helena Ludwinsky, Marcin Kotowski, Denis Augusto Zabin, Nelson Menolli, Larissa Trierveiler-Pereira, Natalia Hanazaki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amanda Prado-EliasCenter of Biological Sciences, Department of Ecology and Zoology, Laboratory of Human Ecology and Ethnobotany, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, 88010970, SC, Brazil. amandapra.elias@gmail.com.
Rafaela Helena LudwinskyCenter of Biological Sciences, Department of Ecology and Zoology, Laboratory of Human Ecology and Ethnobotany, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, 88010970, SC, Brazil.
Marcin KotowskiBotanical Garden, Center for Biological Diversity Conservation in Powsin, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warszawa, Poland.
Denis Augusto ZabinIFungiLab (Laboratório de Ensino Pesquisa e Extensão em Micologia), Departamento de Ciências da Natureza e Matemática, Subárea de Biologia, Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de São Paulo (IFSP), Campus São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Nelson MenolliIFungiLab (Laboratório de Ensino Pesquisa e Extensão em Micologia), Departamento de Ciências da Natureza e Matemática, Subárea de Biologia, Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de São Paulo (IFSP), Campus São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Larissa Trierveiler-PereiraLaboratório de Estudos Micológicos (LEMic-UFSCar), Centro de Ciências da Natureza, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Campus Lagoa do Sino, Buri, SP, Brazil.
Natalia HanazakiCenter of Biological Sciences, Department of Ecology and Zoology, Laboratory of Human Ecology and Ethnobotany, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, 88010970, SC, Brazil.

Funding

Brazilian Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) 306789/2022-1Brazilian Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) 314236/2021-0CAPES PROEXT-PG nº 306789/2022-1Foundation for the Support of Research and Innovation of the State of Santa Catarina - FAPESC nº 48/202Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2018/15677-0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEthnomycological studies explore the relationships between humans and fungi, often reflecting cultural practices and ecological knowledge. While such studies have expanded across Brazil, the Southern region remains understudied. This research aims to document the ethnomycological knowledge of Polish and Ukrainian immigrant descendant communities in a subtropical area in Southern Brazil, and discuss the persistence, transformation, and erosion of mycological knowledge.

methodsFieldwork was conducted in rural areas of Itaiópolis and Papanduva (Santa Catarina, Brazil), with 35 participants interviewed using semi-structured methods. A photographic catalog was used to support species identification. Fungal specimens were collected, morphologically identified, and in some cases, DNA barcoded. The data were analyzed qualitatively.

resultsA total of 19 fungal species were reported, with Agaricus, Armillaria, Macrolepiota, and Auricularia being the most cited genera. Mushrooms were primarily used as food, though medicinal, ornamental, recreational, and symbolic uses were also documented. Traditional recipes and vernacular names in Polish and Ukrainian were preserved, illustrating cultural continuity. Some reports suggest stock knowledge persists, even when active use has declined.

conclusionsThe study reveals that mushrooms remain culturally significant among immigrant descendant communities in Southern Brazil. While some traditional knowledge is preserved and even adapted, other aspects show signs of erosion or restricted transmission. The findings highlight how immigration, environmental factors, and cultural resilience interact in shaping mycological knowledge. This research contributes to the broader understanding of how human-fungus relationships evolve in migratory contexts and calls attention to the importance of preserving biocultural heritage.

Indexed as

AgaricalesEmigrants and ImmigrantsKnowledgeAdultBrazilEthnobotanyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPolandUkraineCultural resilienceEthnomycologyFungiImmigrationMycological knowledgeTraditional knowledge

Identifiers

PMID41398276
PMCPMC12822341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.