Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41398269›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2025

Clinicians' experience of the research ready grant program: just-in-time learning to facilitate regional research capacity.

Pauline Calleja, Tracey Flenady, Amy-Louise Byrne, Lisa Wirihana, Andrea Scott, Pammie Ellem, Luke Ryan, Ashlyn Sahay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Pauline CallejaCollege of Healthcare Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia. Pauline.calleja@jcu.edu.au.
Tracey FlenadySchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Sciences, CQUniversity, Rockhampton, Australia.
Amy-Louise ByrneSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Sciences, CQUniversity, Sydney, Australia.
Lisa WirihanaSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Sciences, CQUniversity, Rockhampton, Australia.
Andrea ScottCentral Queensland Hospital and Health Service (CQHHS), Rockhampton, Australia.
Pammie EllemSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Sciences, CQUniversity, Bundaberg, Australia.
Luke RyanSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Sciences, CQUniversity, Rockhampton, Australia.
Ashlyn SahaySchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Sciences, CQUniversity, Mackay, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearch capacity building programs, such as the Research Ready Grant Program (RRGP), are important methods of engaging clinicians in research knowledge and processes. Understanding the experiences and perceptions of clinicians who engage with such programs is important, as they provide valuable insights into the design and approach of research capability building programs.

methodsUnder the framework of the New World Kirkpatrick Model of evaluation, this study adopted a descriptive qualitative approach and used semi-structured interviews to explore the experiences of clinicians who engaged with the RRGP. The aims were to identify the components of the program that facilitate clinicians’ capacity to participate in the research processes. One member of each funded research team from the RRGP 2022 cohort was interviewed (n = 6). Interview transcripts were thematically analysed.

resultsThematic analysis found that RRGP provided just in time learning, leveraging current clinical issues to engage clinicians, and provide experiential learning which demystified research processes. In the regional setting, the RRGP allowed clinicians to think globally, but to apply research to their local setting.

conclusionThe RRGP provides a vehicle for change to facilitate learning and offers opportunities for clinicians to engage in research. Facilitating collaboration, quarantining time and space for research and balancing work, life and research time are important elements to consider when implementing research capability programs.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchCapacity BuildingResearch PersonnelResearch Support as TopicHumansInterviews as TopicQualitative ResearchClinical researchResearch capacity buildingResearch ready grant program

Identifiers

PMID41398269
PMCPMC12706971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.