ArticleBMC health services research2025
Clinicians' experience of the research ready grant program: just-in-time learning to facilitate regional research capacity.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundResearch capacity building programs, such as the Research Ready Grant Program (RRGP), are important methods of engaging clinicians in research knowledge and processes. Understanding the experiences and perceptions of clinicians who engage with such programs is important, as they provide valuable insights into the design and approach of research capability building programs.
methodsUnder the framework of the New World Kirkpatrick Model of evaluation, this study adopted a descriptive qualitative approach and used semi-structured interviews to explore the experiences of clinicians who engaged with the RRGP. The aims were to identify the components of the program that facilitate clinicians’ capacity to participate in the research processes. One member of each funded research team from the RRGP 2022 cohort was interviewed (n = 6). Interview transcripts were thematically analysed.
resultsThematic analysis found that RRGP provided just in time learning, leveraging current clinical issues to engage clinicians, and provide experiential learning which demystified research processes. In the regional setting, the RRGP allowed clinicians to think globally, but to apply research to their local setting.
conclusionThe RRGP provides a vehicle for change to facilitate learning and offers opportunities for clinicians to engage in research. Facilitating collaboration, quarantining time and space for research and balancing work, life and research time are important elements to consider when implementing research capability programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.