ArticleBMC surgery2025
Pararectus vs. lateral window approach in AO B2.2 pelvic fractures: impact on short-term functional outcomes.
Article in BMC surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe optimal surgical approach for managing AO type B2.2 pelvic ring injuries remains a topic of debate. This retrospective cohort study aimed to compare perioperative, radiographic, and short-term functional outcomes between the pararectus (P group) and lateral window (L group) approaches.
methodsA total of 65 patients (27 in the P group, 38 in the L group) treated between 2017 and 2021 were evaluated. Postoperative pelvic symmetry and fracture gap reduction were assessed using the Matta/Tornetta criteria, Lefaivre criteria, inlet/outlet ratios, and multiplanar computed tomography. Functional recovery was measured using the Merle d'Aubigné hip score and Majeed pelvic score at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively.
resultsRadiographic parameters and fracture gap reduction were similar between the groups. However, the P group demonstrated significantly greater improvements in functional scores at all time points (p < 0.01).
conclusionOur findings suggest that while both approaches provide satisfactory radiological outcomes, the pararectus approach may facilitate superior short-term functional recovery in patients with AO B2.2 pelvic ring injuries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.