Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41398208›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Leveraging spatial cues from cochlear implant microphones to efficiently enhance speech separation in naturalistic listening scenes.

Feyisayo Olalere, Kiki van der Heijden, H Christiaan Stronks, Jeroen Briaire, Johan H M Frijns, Marcel van Gerven

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Feyisayo OlalereDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. feyisayo.olalere@donders.ru.nl.
Kiki van der HeijdenDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
H Christiaan StronksDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Jeroen BriaireDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Johan H M FrijnsDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Marcel van GervenDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

NWO Cross-over 17619
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the success of speech separation approaches for dry (non-reverb) speech mixtures, speech separation in naturalistic, spatial, and reverberant acoustic environments remains challenging. This limits the effectiveness of current speech separation methods for assistive hearing devices as well as neuroprosthetic devices such as cochlear implants (CIs). Here, we investigate whether a deep neural network model for speech separation can utilize the spatial information in naturalistic listening scenes as captured by a CI's microphones to improve separation performance. We examined the impact of latent spatial cues (inherently present in two-channel speech mixtures, but need to be learned from these mixtures), as well as pre-computed spatial cues added to the speech mixtures as auxiliary input features (inter-channel level and phase differences, ILDs and IPDs). Specifically, we introduce a two-channel version of the SuDoRM-RF speech separation model, which takes as input speech mixtures recorded with two CI microphones and shows that latent spatial cues enhance separation performance without affecting model efficiency in terms of model complexity and inference latency. Pre-computed spatial cues - especially IPDs - enhanced separation performance even more, but simultaneously reduced model efficiency. Finally, simulating a CI user's listening experience with a vocoder showed that the beneficial effect of spatial cues on DNN speech separation persists even if the separated speech streams are spectrotemporally degraded as in the output of a CI.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantsCuesSpeech PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAdultFemaleHumansMaleNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID41398208
PMCPMC12815942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.