ArticleScientific reports2025
Bayesian-driven autonomous defense adaptive consensus optimisation for blockchain networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Blockchain networks have revolutionized decentralized applications but remain vulnerable to evolving security threats due to their reliance on static consensus mechanisms that cannot adapt to changing threat landscapes. This paper addresses this critical security gap by proposing Autonomous Defense-Adaptive Consensus Optimisation for Blockchain Networks (ADACON), an original framework for the dynamic adjustment of consensus mechanisms based on Bayesian threat detection. The research investigates how real-time adaptation between multiple consensus protocols can enhance blockchain resilience while maintaining performance. The approach integrates a Bayesian Threat Detector, Consensus Adapter, and Network State monitor in a modular architecture that continuously assesses network conditions and switches between five consensus mechanisms (PoW, PoS, PBFT, PoA, DPoS) as threats emerge. The framework was evaluated through comprehensive simulations involving 1,000 nodes, testing response to six distinct attack vectors, including Sybil, DoS, Byzantine, Eclipse, Majority, and Routing attacks. Results demonstrate that ADACON effectively identifies and responds to varied attacks with a latency of 29.7 ms and throughput of 833 TPS). Statistical validation across five independent simulation runs (seeds 5-9) confirmed framework reliability with consistent performance metrics (CV < 7.1% for latency, 5.4% for throughput). Delegated Proof of Stake emerged as the most frequently selected mechanism (23.2%) due to its balanced performance across multiple security dimensions. Significantly, the system exhibited greater adaptability and attack coverage than existing hybrid approaches. The previous high switching frequency was reduced by using hysteresis, i.e., by providing dwell time and an improved threshold that avoids unnecessary switching. The study concludes that dynamic consensus adaptation offers substantial security advantages for blockchain networks, particularly in high-security environments like financial systems and critical infrastructure. However, further research must focus on optimizing switching frequency and developing secure transition protocols to maximize effectiveness. ADACON represents an incremental extension tested toward more resilient blockchain systems that can autonomously respond to emerging threats while balancing security, performance, and resource utilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.