ArticleScientific reports2025
Sustainable shear behavior of clayey sand reinforced with recycled PET strips under moisture variation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Moisture-sensitive granular soils containing fines, such as sand-clay (SC) mixtures, lose their shear strength after cycles of wetting and drying, compromising the stability of shallow foundations, embankments, and sub-base layers. Improving performance using conventional stabilisers such as cement and lime comes at a cost to the environment and the economy. This study examines recycled polyethylene terephthalate (PET) strips as a green reinforcement for a sand-kaolin mixture (65% sand, 35% kaolin; SC according to the unified soil classification system unified soil classification system (USCS)). Direct shear tests were performed conducted at normal stresses of 100, 200, and 300 kPa and moisture contents of ranging from 0 to 12%. The unreinforced samples suffered a loss of strength of up to 50% at 12% moisture content, while the PET-reinforced soils achieved a maximum shear stress that was 25-30% higher, 40% greater cohesion, and a 35% reduction in vertical deformation. The friction angle was slightly better (+ 1.3° at 0-4% moisture content) but decreased at higher water contents due to lubrication. Even at 12% moisture content, the reinforced soils had a cohesion of 19 kPa compared to 15 kPa for the unreinforced soils and a shear stress of 90 kPa compared to 145 kPa for the dry strength. These results confirm that PET strips act as traction elements, resisting softening due to moisture and offering a sustainable and cost-effective alternative to traditional stabilisers, while contributing to circular economy initiatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.