ArticleScientific reports2025
Antifibrotic therapy in familial idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a comparative cohort study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Before the introduction of antifibrotic therapy, patients with familial pulmonary fibrosis (FPF) were reported to have a higher mortality risk than those with sporadic disease. Genetic predisposition plays an important role in the development of interstitial lung disease (ILD), including idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). The 2023 European Respiratory Society consensus statement defined FPF and recommended antifibrotic drugs for treatment; however, their efficacy in FPF remains unclear. We conducted a retrospective multicohort study of 280 patients with IPF receiving antifibrotic therapy (exploratory cohort, n = 141; validation cohort, n = 139). FPF was defined as fibrotic ILD in at least two first- or second-degree relatives. We examined tolerability, causes of drug discontinuation, incidence of acute exacerbation (AE), and mortality. Among all patients, 45 (16.1%) had FPF-IPF. These patients were younger and included a lower proportion of men compared with sporadic IPF. No significant differences were observed between groups in drug tolerability, discontinuation causes, AE incidence, or mortality. Multivariate analyses adjusting for gender-age-physiology index confirmed that FPF was not associated with increased mortality. In conclusion, under antifibrotic therapy, FPF-IPF and sporadic IPF demonstrated comparable tolerability, risk of AE, and mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.