ArticleScientific reports2025
Heavy metal in cosmetics and its risk to future generation in remote area of Azad Jammu and Kashmir Trarkhel District Sudhnoti.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Toxic metals in Cosmetic and Personal Care Products: Occurrence, Concentrations, and Health Risks.Biological trace element research · 2026Review
- Toxic metals in Cosmetic and Personal Care Products: Occurrence, Concentrations, and Health Risks.Biological trace element research · 2026Review
- Analysis of Ni, Cu, and Fe in Loose Cosmetic Products: A Preliminary Dermal Exposure and Health Risk Assessment.Toxics · 2026Article
- Concentrations and Probabilistic Health Risks of Seven Metals in Face and Eye Cosmetics Across Seven Asian Countries.Toxics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The widespread use of cosmetic products has raised global concerns regarding their potential toxicity, particularly the heavy metals content. While cosmetics serve economic and aesthetic purposes, their health implications, especially in underdeveloped regions, are becoming increasingly evident. This study investigates the level of toxic heavy metals in both branded and local cosmetic products available in the remote area of Trarkhel, District Sudhnoti, Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK), Pakistan, where specific data on cosmetic contamination with heavy metals and associated health risks are lacking. The presence of these metals, whether as intentional additives or impurities from raw materials, is particularly pronounced in unregulated, locally produced, and potentially counterfeit imported cosmetics, posing significant public health challenges. A total of 30 cosmetic samples, comprising lipsticks, foundations, eye shadows, nail polishes, and others, were analyzed using Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (AAS-700) to determine the levels of lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), copper (Cu), cobalt (Co), silver (Ag), nickel (Ni), Arsenic (As), manganese (Mn) and mercury (Hg). On comparative basis, different brands of lipsticks contain the highest mean concentrations (mg/kg) of Ni (89.3 ± 0.39), Mn (79.8 ± 0.03), Cu (62.1 ± 0.04), Pb (23.3 ± 0.05), Co (13.8 ± 0.03), Cd (1.35 ± 0.01) and Ag (0.73 ± 0.01), whereas branded and local creams had elevated level of Hg (358.53 ± 0.02) followed by Zn ( 1181 ± 0.04), Co (28.9 ± 0.04), Ni (11.0 ± 0.04), Pb (6.21 ± 0.06) Cu (3.52 ± 0.01), As (1.56 ± 0.01), and Cd (1.35 ± 0.01) mg/Kg, with least concentration in Mn and Ag. The level of heavy metals was lower in nail polishes compared to lipsticks and creams. Multivariate analysis suggested a strong correlation among Pb, Cu, Ni, Cd, and Mn, while Cd showed a negative correlation with Co, Ag, and As, and Mn, indicating disparity in distribution and sources of contamination. Health risk assessment further revealed that Margin of Safety (MoS), Hazard Quotient (HQ), and Hazard Index (HI) values fell above the permissible boundaries for most of the lipsticks, creams, and nail polishes. Regarding carcinogenicity, LCR values surpassed the established threshold in all cosmetic products with the exception of lipsticks. The findings emphasise the urgent need for routine monitoring and enforcing strict quality assurance protocols to safeguard the safety of cosmetics, particularly in vulnerable and underdeveloped areas like Trarkhel. This study not only fills a crucial research gap but also provides a foundation for future studies on cosmetic toxicity and public health awareness in rural regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.