ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2026
Mechanisms of Central Hemodynamic Changes Due to Limb Tourniquets and Cuffs: Mathematical Modeling Studies with Implications for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeLimb compression is proposed as a supplement to cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) because it has the potential to increase central organ blood flow rates. This is significant because CPR only has a survival rate of 10-15%, and survival depends on the amount of blood flow generated during CPR. However, the underlying physiological mechanisms are not understood, thereby limiting optimal application of limb compression during CPR. Therefore, this study addressed the hypothesis that circuit pathway reduction, volume displacement, and wave reflection mechanisms contribute to higher central organ blood flow rates. Mathematical models were utilized because modeling is the only way to isolate physiological mechanisms.
methodsThis study utilized two validated mathematical models that were minimally altered to investigate limb compression during CPR. A lumped-parameter model addressed circuit pathway reduction and volume displacement while the other model isolated wave reflections.
resultsRelative to standard CPR, the model simulating circuit pathway reduction via CPR with tourniquets predicted increases of cerebral and coronary flow rates by 3% each while the model simulating volume displacement via CPR with constant pressure cuffs predicted increased cerebral and coronary flow rates by up to 74% and 109%, respectively. Furthermore, the wave reflection model predicted increases in blood flow rates of major cerebral arteries up to 11% and across all major abdominal arteries up to 27%.
conclusionAll limb compression configurations and modalities resulted in increased predicted central organ blood flow rates with volume displacement, wave reflection, and circuit pathway reduction mechanisms, in that order, being most influential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41398123What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.