Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41398117›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2025

Task-dependent learning of non-adjacent dependencies: Success in a familiarity rating task but failure in a two-alternative forced-choice task.

Helen Shiyang Lu, Toben H Mintz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Helen Shiyang LuDepartment of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. helens.lu@ubc.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3529-1226
Toben H MintzDepartment of Psychology and Department of Linguistics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5437-7482

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acquiring non-adjacent dependencies (NADs) from continuous sequences can be challenging for adults, with prior research showing varied outcomes depending on the properties of the stimuli and methods of assessments. This study investigated whether different behavioral tasks vary in their ability to detect NAD learning. All participants (N = 322) underwent equivalent training phases involving exposure to NAD trigrams in a continuous speech stream. During the test phase, their learning of the grammatical NAD patterns was evaluated using either a two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC, N = 200) task or a familiarity rating task (N = 122). Participants in the 2AFC task performed at chance, regardless of whether the ungrammatical trigram differed minimally or maximally from the grammatical trigram. In contrast, participants in the familiarity rating task rated grammatical trigrams as more familiar than ungrammatical ones, suggesting that the familiarity rating task may be more sensitive to subtle learning effects. These findings highlight the importance of task design in the detection of NAD learning, with implications for the broader field of statistical learning research.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorLearningRecognition, PsychologyAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMalePsycholinguisticsYoung Adult2AFCNon-adjacent dependencyRatingsStatistical learning

Identifiers

PMID41398117
PMCPMC12705766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.