Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41398100›Full record

ReviewHandbook of experimental pharmacology2026

Platelet Function Tests and Monitoring Antiplatelet Therapies.

Simon Davidson

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Handbook of experimental pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Simon DavidsonFaculty of Medical Science, Division of Medicine, University College London, London, UK. simon.davidson@ucl.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the late 1990s, the antiplatelet agent clopidogrel, a P2Y12 inhibitor, was introduced into clinical practice. Concurrently, several new methods for assessing platelet function emerged, such as the PFA-100 in 1995, marking the beginning of a sustained expansion in platelet function testing. It soon became apparent that patient responses to clopidogrel varied significantly, with some individuals exhibiting high on-treatment platelet reactivity. This variability prompted discussions around the utility of platelet function testing to tailor antiplatelet therapy. Additionally, such testing was proposed for patients preparing for cardiac surgery to better manage the balance between thrombotic risk before surgery and bleeding risk during the perioperative period. This chapter explores widely used platelet function tests in these contexts, particularly those considered point-of-care (POC) or requiring minimal laboratory processing. It also reviews recent guidelines and clinical trial evidence, building on a previously published chapter, regarding the role and effectiveness of platelet function testing in these clinical scenarios.

Indexed as

Blood PlateletsDrug MonitoringPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsPlatelet Function TestsClopidogrelHumansPoint-of-Care SystemsPoint-of-Care TestingPurinergic P2Y Receptor AntagonistsClopidogrelPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsPurinergic P2Y Receptor AntagonistsAntiplatelet monitoringAspirinMultiplateP2Y12 inhibitorsPFARotemTEGVerifyNow

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.