ArticleNPJ precision oncology2025
Improved circulating tumor DNA profiling by simultaneous extraction of DNA methylation and copy number information from methylated DNA sequencing data.
Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Prognostic value of peri-operative circulating tumour DNA levels estimated by cell-free DNA methylation in patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases.EBioMedicine · 2026Article
- Methylated CfDNA may distinguish between high- and intermediate-risk uveal melanoma: a pilot study.Cancer cell international · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis offers a powerful, minimally invasive approach to improve cancer care by measuring tumor-specific genomic and epigenetic alterations. Here, we demonstrate the versatility of MeD-seq, a methylation-dependent sequencing assay, for comprehensive cfDNA analysis, including DNA methylation profiling, chromosomal copy number (CN) alterations, and tumor fraction (TF) estimation. MeD-seq-derived CN profiles and TF estimates from 38 colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases (CRLM) and 5 ovarian cancer patients were highly comparable to shallow whole-genome sequencing (sWGS), validating our approach. For 120 CRLM patients, we used MeD-seq CN and TF information in an improved differential methylation model, which detected additional significantly Differentially Methylated Regions (DMRs) correlating with TF estimates. Using the identified DMR sets, we were subsequently able to distinguish healthy blood donors from CRLM patients with low amounts of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as well. These findings establish MeD-seq as an affordable platform for tumor-agnostic detection of cancer-specific signals in plasma. This methodological framework provides a foundation for clinical applications requiring sensitive ctDNA detection from limited sample material, including treatment response assessment and minimal residual disease monitoring.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.