ArticleScientific reports2025
Textbook outcomes after splenectomy in patients with portal hypertension.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Textbook Outcome (TO) is a composite outcome measure that integrates commonly utilized independent outcome measures to comprehensively reflect the optimal post-surgical treatment result. It is used to assess the quality of surgeries and has been widely employed in hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgeries. However, its utility in splenic surgery remains unknown. Patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension are often managed with splenectomy. The objective of this study was to investigate the perioperative textbook outcomes of splenectomy and identify the risk factors associated with achieving textbook outcomes after undergoing splenectomy. The clinical data of 263 patients with portal hypertension and hypersplenism who underwent splenectomy at our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Perioperative clinical data were statistically analyzed using t-test, Wilcoxon test, χ
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.