Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41398077›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2026

Females have shorter scalp-to-cortex distances and receive stronger TMS electrical fields: Implications for clinical treatment.

Daniel M McCalley, Nathanael J Cadicamo, Francesca Weijerman, Lea-Tereza Tenekedjieva, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, Brian Knutson, Claudia B Padula

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Daniel M McCalleyStanford University School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford, CA, USA. mccalled@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8963-5413
Nathanael J CadicamoVeterans Affairs Palo Alto Healthcare System, Sierra Pacific Mental Illness Research Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Francesca WeijermanStanford University School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford, CA, USA.
Lea-Tereza TenekedjievaStanford University School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford, CA, USA.
Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
Brian KnutsonStanford University, Department of Psychology, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7669-426X
Claudia B PadulaStanford University School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0574-9374

Funding

Developing Functional Connectivity-Guided TMS for Alcohol Use DisorderK99AA031508 · NIAAA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MCCALLEY, DANIEL · 2024 to 2025
$347k
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) K99AA031508
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The strength of a given transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) pulse decays rapidly with distance. Male and female bone structure reliably differs by the shape of the frontal bone, mandible, and inion. Given the morphology of these structures constitutes much of the scalp-to-cortex distance (STCD), we hypothesized that females have shorter STCDs and thereby receive stronger TMS electrical field strengths, relative to males. Head models (n = 411; 197 female, 214 male) were constructed from MRIs of healthy participants (ages 18-90). STCD and peak electrical field strength were measured at 50 EEG 10-20 sites (SimNIBSv3.2). Linear models (bootstrapped and Benajamini-Hochberg multiple comparison-corrected) evaluated the influence of sex on STCD and electrical field strength. Females had significantly shorter STCDs at 27/50 sites and stronger TMS electrical fields at 18/50. When normalized by data collected at the motor cortex, females had significantly shorter STCD at 40/49 sites and stronger TMS electrical fields at 29/49 sites. The largest effect size differences were detected at the frontal, temporal, and occipital poles, and the cerebellum. Interestingly, STCD at the motor cortex was not different between sexes, suggesting the motor cortex-based dosing strategies produce unequal electrical fields between sexes. These data provide a mathematically grounded explanation for sex-differences in clinical outcome and may be relevant to other modalities that depend on electromagnetic signals (e.g., EEG, MEG).

Indexed as

Cerebral CortexScalpSex CharacteristicsTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41398077
PMCPMC12932668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.