ArticleNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2026
Females have shorter scalp-to-cortex distances and receive stronger TMS electrical fields: Implications for clinical treatment.
Article in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sex Differences in Scalp-to-Cortex Distance: Implications for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Efficacy in Alcohol Use Disorder.Alcohol, clinical & experimental research · 2026Article
- How Standardized Is Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Treatment for Depression? Large-Cohort Modeling Reveals Systematic Dosimetric Variability.Psychotherapy and psychosomatics · 2026Article
- Mapping shared and specific cortical after-effects of repetitive TMS on brain function.BMC medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The strength of a given transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) pulse decays rapidly with distance. Male and female bone structure reliably differs by the shape of the frontal bone, mandible, and inion. Given the morphology of these structures constitutes much of the scalp-to-cortex distance (STCD), we hypothesized that females have shorter STCDs and thereby receive stronger TMS electrical field strengths, relative to males. Head models (n = 411; 197 female, 214 male) were constructed from MRIs of healthy participants (ages 18-90). STCD and peak electrical field strength were measured at 50 EEG 10-20 sites (SimNIBSv3.2). Linear models (bootstrapped and Benajamini-Hochberg multiple comparison-corrected) evaluated the influence of sex on STCD and electrical field strength. Females had significantly shorter STCDs at 27/50 sites and stronger TMS electrical fields at 18/50. When normalized by data collected at the motor cortex, females had significantly shorter STCD at 40/49 sites and stronger TMS electrical fields at 29/49 sites. The largest effect size differences were detected at the frontal, temporal, and occipital poles, and the cerebellum. Interestingly, STCD at the motor cortex was not different between sexes, suggesting the motor cortex-based dosing strategies produce unequal electrical fields between sexes. These data provide a mathematically grounded explanation for sex-differences in clinical outcome and may be relevant to other modalities that depend on electromagnetic signals (e.g., EEG, MEG).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.