Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41398043›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Neural evidence for a bilingual advantage in conflict monitoring among Dai bilinguals.

Rui Yu, Jiemin Zhang, Fuhua Yang, Jiaci Lin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rui YuSchool of Nursing, Yunnan University of Chinese Medicine, Kunming, 650500, China.
Jiemin ZhangFaculty of Education, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming, 650500, China.
Fuhua YangSchool of Information, Yunnan University of Chinese Medicine, Kunming, 650500, China. yangfuhua@ynucm.edu.cn.
Jiaci LinSchool of Social and Behavioral Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210023, China. linjiaci0210@163.com.

Funding

the Joint Special Key Project of Yunnan Federation of Social Sciences and Yunnan University of Chinese Medicine LHZX202403the Yunnan Provincial Department of Education Scientific Research Fund 2024J0412
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research on the bilingual advantage in cognitive control has yielded mixed results, particularly across diverse populations. This study examined whether Dai bilinguals in China demonstrate enhanced cognitive control compared to monolinguals. Participants completed a classic Eriksen Flanker task while both behavioral responses and EEG data were recorded. Analyses focused on reaction times, conflict effects, congruency sequence effects, and the ERP components N2 (associated with conflict monitoring) and P3 (associated with attentional allocation). Although no significant group differences emerged in behavioral performance, bilinguals showed reduced N2 and increased P3 amplitudes relative to monolinguals, indicating group differences in neural correlates of conflict monitoring. No differences were observed in conflict or congruency sequence effects between the groups. These findings suggest a bilingual experience may be associated with differences in the neural dynamics of conflict monitoring, even in the absence of behavioral differences. The effects were not lateralized. This highlights the value of combining behavioral and ERP measures to investigate bilingual cognitive processing in non-Indo-European language contexts.

Indexed as

CognitionConflict, PsychologicalMultilingualismAdolescentAdultAttentionChinaElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsFemaleHumansMaleReaction TimeYoung AdultBilingual advantageConflict effectConflict monitoringCongruency sequence effectInhibitory control

Identifiers

PMID41398043
PMCPMC12808119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.