Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41398016›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

The feasibility of a complex intervention, a medical tattooing nurse-led clinic after breast cancer surgery: results from the ARCADE_M mixed-methods study.

Deborah Maselli, Martina Torreggiani, Valeria Soffientini, Tiziana Livieri, Gloria Farioli, Stefania Lucchi, Cristiana Caffarri, Diego Bina, Fabio Castagnetti, Luca Ghirotto and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Deborah MaselliResearch, EBP and IRCCS Unit, Health Professions Department, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy. deborah.maselli@ausl.re.it.
Martina TorreggianiResearch, EBP and IRCCS Unit, Health Professions Department, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Valeria SoffientiniResearch, EBP and IRCCS Unit, Health Professions Department, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Tiziana LivieriDepartment of Surgery, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Gloria FarioliBreast Surgery Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Stefania LucchiDepartment of Surgery, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Cristiana CaffarriHealth Professions Department, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Diego BinaHealth Professions Department, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Fabio CastagnettiPlastic Surgery Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Luca GhirottoQualitative Research Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Paola FerriDepartment of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Stefania CostiResearch, EBP and IRCCS Unit, Health Professions Department, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical tattoos after breast cancer surgery are a therapeutic approach to regain psychophysical integrity. The tattooing of the Nipple-Areola Complex (NAC) in the ARCADE clinic involves three sessions, 30-40 days apart, and specialized nurses perform it upon medical indication. This study aims to assess the feasibility of a NAC tattooing clinic for women who have undergone surgical treatment for breast cancer in the Comprehensive Cancer Center of Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, in Italy. This project is guided by the Medical Research Council framework for the development and evaluation of complex interventions, focusing specifically on the feasibility phase. The objectives of this phase include assessing organisational sustainability through retrospective analysis of activity data (Endpoint 1); evaluating the NAC tattoos' quality, by selecting a panel of experts that scored photographs'set, in a 1-5 Likert scale (Endpoint 2); exploring the professionals' perceptions on their involvement in the clinic, through a qualitative study with semi-structured interviews (Endpoint 3). Endpoint 1: The activity had a standard character in timing and materials. 100% of the sample (N = 33) gained a satisfactory cosmetic result, without adverse events, or other complications like excessive color fading or pain (none or mild for 79%). Endpoint 2: 22 sets were retrospectively retrieved and included in the analysis. The tattooed NACs demonstrated excellent quality, achieving a medium score of 4.7 for color similarity and symmetry, and 4.8 for 3D effect. Endpoint 3: Five professionals (two nurses, one surgeon, two managers) were interviewed. The main macro-themes acknowledged considerations about the value of the clinic, the barriers and the facilitators encountered, and the related future needs. A nurse-led NAC tattooing clinic is a feasible, complex intervention for breast cancer care. The combination of the retrieved data analysis and those generated by the qualitative approach underlines how resource availability and personnel motivation are influential in determining goal achievement, as well as accountability promotion and competence development. The implementation of this service empowered a support network by engaging the community and professionals in collaborative efforts to provide this final step of care, which can be determinant for psychophysical recovery.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsTattooingAdultAgedFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansItalyMiddle AgedNipplesNursesRetrospective StudiesBreast cancerCancer survivorComplex interventionHealth service researchMedical tattooingNipple-Areola complexWomen health services

Identifiers

PMID41398016
PMCPMC12804903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.