Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41397791›Full record

ReviewZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery2025

[Anteromedial cortical support reduction in treatment of trochanteric femur fractures: a ten-year reappraisal].

Sunjun Hu, Shouchao Du, Shimin Chang, Wei Mao, Zhenhai Wang, Kewei Tian, Tao Liu, Yunfeng Rui

Abstract readReviewEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Review in Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. [Positive cortical support reduction in treatment of trochanteric femur fractures: history in theory establishment and its inspiration for clinical innovations].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sunjun HuDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Yangpu Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200090, P. R. China.
Shouchao DuDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Yangpu Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200090, P. R. China.
Shimin ChangDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Yangpu Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200090, P. R. China.
Wei MaoNational Orthopedic Center, the Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200233, P. R. China.
Zhenhai WangDepartment of Traumatic Orthopedic Surgery, Yantaishan Hospital, Yantai Shandong, 264001, P. R. China.
Kewei TianNo.1 Department of Hip Injury and Disease, Luoyang Orthopedic-Traumatological Hospital of Henan Province (Henan Provincial Orthopedic Hospital), Luoyang Henan, 471002, P. R. China.
Tao LiuDepartment of Orthopedic Trauma Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Qingdao Shandong, 266035, P.R. China.
Yunfeng RuiDepartment of Orthopedic Trauma, Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing Jiangsu, 210009, P. R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This review summarized the first 10-year progresses and controversies in the concept of anteromedial cortical support reduction, to provide references for further study and clinical applications. Methods: Relevant domestic and foreign literature on cortical support reduction was extensively reviewed to summarize the definition of positive, neutral, and negative support, anteromedial cortices at the inferior corner, intraoperative technical tips for fracture reduction, radiographic assessment at different periods, comparison between positive versus neutral and medial versus anterior support, and the clinical efficacy of Chang reduction quality criteria (CRQC) and postoperative stability score. Results: Anteromedial cortical support reduction was only focused on the cortex of anteromedial inferior corner, with no concern the status of lateral wall or lesser trochanter. Anteromedial cortex was seldom involved by fracture comminution, it was thicker, denser, and stronger, and was the key for mechanical buttress of the head-neck fragment to share compression load. Positive, neutral, and negative support were also called "extramedullary, anatomic, and intramedullary reduction", respectively. There was hardly seen parallel cortical apposition, but characterized by some kinds of head-neck rotation, for example 10°-15° flexed rotation for positive cortical contact and support. Due to intraoperative compression and postoperative impaction, the status of cortical support may be changed at different time of radiographic examination. The positive medial cortex support was more reliable with less reduction loss than its neutral counterpart, and the anterior cortex contact was more predictive than the medial cortex for final results. As incorporation the bearing of cortex apposition and using a 4-point score, CRQC demonstrated more efficacy and was gradually accepted and applied in the evaluation of trochanteric fracture reduction quality. Postoperative stability score (8 points) provided a assessment tool for early weight-bearing in safety to prevent mechanical failure. Conclusion: Anteromedial cortical support reduction is a key point for stability reconstruction in the treatment of trochanteric femur fractures. Evidence has definitely shown that non-negative (positive and neutral) is superior to negative (loss of cortical support). There is a tendency that positive cortex support is superior to neutral, but high quality study with large sample size is needed for a clear conclusion.

Indexed as

FemurFracture Fixation, InternalFracture Fixation, IntramedullaryHip FracturesHumansTreatment Outcomeanteromedial cortexcortical support reductionfracture reduction quality criteriapositive supportstability scoreTrochanteric femur fracture

Identifiers

PMID41397791
PMCPMC12705310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.