ArticleBMJ open2025
Nomogram for suicidal ideation and non-suicidal self-injury risk assessment in Dehong District nursing staff: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to identify and validate risk factors for suicidal ideation (SI) and non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) among nursing staff through the development and application of a risk model and nomogram.
designA cross-sectional online survey was conducted in Dehong District to collect relevant data.
participantsA total of 1774 Chinese nursing staff members were enrolled in this study.
resultsMultiple factors were independently associated with SI among nursing staff. These included divorce or other non-marital status (OR=2.42, 95% CI 1.07 to 5.44), drinking frequency (OR=1.34, 95% CI 1.001 to 1.79), loneliness (OR=1.26, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.44), depressive symptoms (OR=1.13, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.18), childhood trauma (OR=1.03, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.05) and life quality satisfaction (OR=0.63, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.80). Similarly, for NSSI among nursing staff, independent risk factors were identified, such as smoking frequency (OR=1.37, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.85), drinking frequency (OR=1.42, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.91), loneliness (OR=1.21, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.39), depressive symptoms (OR=1.13, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.18) and childhood trauma (OR=1.03, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.05). A nomogram for assessing SI/NSSI was established and demonstrated good calibration, with a Concordance Index of 0.82 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.86) for SI and 0.81 (95% CI 0.78 to 0.85) for NSSI.
conclusionThe findings of this study can be used to identify nursing staff at risk of developing SI/NSSI. By using the developed nomograms for self-assessment, individuals might gain a better understanding of their occupational stress levels while performing routine work tasks. However, it should be noted that the study lacks external validation, which limits the generalisability of the findings at this stage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.