ArticleBMJ open2025
Using 'research cafés' as a proof-of-concept model for engaging minoritised communities in UK health research: a mixed-methods feasibility study in South West London.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis proof-of-concept study explored the feasibility and acceptability of research cafés as a community-based model to engage racially minoritised communities in health research, with a focus on mental health.
designAdopting a community peer research approach, a research team led by researchers from racially minoritised backgrounds, partnered with four voluntary organisations to conduct four research cafés. A mixed-methods feasibility design combined descriptive quantitative questionnaire data with thematic analysis of discussion notes to evaluate the impact of these cafés in South West London.
settingThe study took place in Wandsworth, Kingston, Croydon and Sutton, in community venues provided by the voluntary organisations.
participantsA total of 75 participants from racially minoritised backgrounds attended the sessions. Participants were intentionally selected based on age, ethnicity, location, mental well-being experiences and willingness to engage in mental health research.
main outcome measuresQuantitative data were collected on participant attendance, demographics and feedback. Qualitative data captured participant perceptions and experiences related to healthcare and research.
resultsThe study took place between October 2023 and March 2024. Out of the 112 individuals who registered, 75 people attended with 74 contributing to the analysis (excluding one on the day sign-up). Participants were predominantly Asian/Asian British (62%) and Black/Black British (31%). All participants reported feeling comfortable and respected. Understanding of research improved for 96% and 95% expressed interest in further research involvement, most commonly the idea of joining a peer research network (64%). Participants also highlighted a need for training in research methods and communication skills for ongoing involvement. Five main themes emerged from the café discussions: (1) systemic barriers to accessing safe healthcare and mistrust of UK healthcare systems; (2) the need for cultural competence and sensitivity in healthcare and research; (3) research as a positive step for change; (4) barriers to research participation and (5) the importance of incentives and feedback for research participation.
conclusionsPreliminary findings suggest that diverse and inclusive community-based partnerships are the basis for developing research cafés as a feasible and acceptable model for engaging racially minoritised communities in health research. They complement existing participatory approaches by creating inclusive, peer-facilitated spaces that build trust, improve awareness and generate high intention for future involvement and participation. Future studies are needed to test the model's scalability across different geographic and demographic contexts and evaluate its long-term impact on research literacy, participation and equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.