SynthesisBMJ open2025
Barriers and facilitators of deceased organ donation among Pakistanis living globally: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo identify the barriers and facilitators towards deceased organ donation among Pakistanis living globally.
designSystematic review using narrative synthesis. DATA SOURCES: CINAHL, Medline with Full Text, Global Health and PsycINFO via EBSCO; Scopus via Elsevier; Web of Science via Clarivate; and PubMed through the US National Library of Medicine and the National Institutes of Health were searched between 1 January 1995 and 31 July 2024 and limited to English. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included qualitative and cross-sectional studies involving Pakistani participants aged 18 years and above, conducted both within Pakistan and internationally across settings such as universities, religious venues, hospitals and workplaces. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Four independent reviewers were involved in screening, quality assessment and data extraction. A narrative synthesis method was employed to synthesise and integrate the data from qualitative and cross-sectional studies. The Joanna Briggs Institute tool was used to assess the quality of the included studies.
resultsOut of 11 944 studies retrieved, 26 studies were included in the current review. Based on the narrative synthesis, the findings are presented under the following five themes: (1) knowledge of deceased organ donation, (2) willingness towards deceased organ donation, (3) collective decision-making overriding individual's preferences, (4) religious uncertainty and its impact on deceased organ donation and (5) trust and the healthcare systems.
conclusionThis review shows that decisions about deceased organ donation are shaped by family dynamics, religious beliefs and trust in healthcare. More diverse research is needed to uncover new gaps and improve donor registration and consent rates in Pakistan. A whole-systems approach, considering families, religion and trust, is essential for effective strategies. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022346343.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.