Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41397743›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

High-dose intermittent theta burst stimulation targeting the individualised frontoparietal cognitive network for post-stroke cognitive impairment: protocol for a randomised sham-controlled trial in China.

Kaiyue Han, Ying Zhou, Jianting Huang, Jianxun Ren, Haitao Lu, Xingxing Liao, Yafei Zhu, Hao Zhang, Hesheng Liu

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05953415 (Personalized Brain Functional Sectors), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05953415 nacompletednot on this map

Personalized Brain Functional Sectors (pBFS) Guided Intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation (iTBS) Therapy for Chronic Post-Stroke Cognitive Impairment (PSCI): A Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorChangping LaboratoryRan2023 to 2026Enrolled60ConditionsChronic Stroke, Cognitive ImpairmentArmsactive iTBS, sham iTBS
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kaiyue HanSchool of Rehabilitation, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-5224-9254
Ying ZhouChangping Laboratory, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1270-9039
Jianting HuangChangping Laboratory, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-6633-9300
Jianxun RenChangping Laboratory, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7885-4546
Haitao LuSchool of Rehabilitation, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1775-9780
Xingxing LiaoSchool of Rehabilitation, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-7634-917X
Yafei ZhuChangping Laboratory, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-1002-0708
Hao ZhangSchool of Rehabilitation, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China zhanghao@crrc.com.cn hesheng@biopic.pku.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8546-3757
Hesheng LiuChangping Laboratory, Beijing, China zhanghao@crrc.com.cn hesheng@biopic.pku.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7233-1509

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCognitive impairment is a common consequence after stroke. Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) has emerged as a promising cognitive therapy. However, traditional iTBS typically employs lower doses and one-size-fits-all stimulation targets, which may not fully capitalise on the potential of this therapy and warrants further evaluation for both efficacy and safety. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of high-dose iTBS targeting the individualised frontoparietal cognitive network (FCN) identified by precision functional neuroimaging for post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a prospective, double-blind, sham-controlled, parallel-group randomised controlled trial. 60 eligible participants with PSCI will be randomly assigned (1:1) to an active iTBS or a sham-controlled group. The active group will receive high-dose iTBS (3600 pulses/day) at 80% resting motor threshold targeting the left individualised FCN, guided by a real-time neuronavigation system. The sham group will follow identical procedures using a sham coil. Both groups will also undergo conventional computerised cognitive training. The intervention will be administered on workdays over a period of 3 weeks, totalling 15 workdays. The primary outcome is the change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores from baseline to immediately post-treatment. Secondary outcomes include long-term change in global cognition, activities of daily living and specific cognitive domains (assessed by a comprehensive neuropsychological battery covering memory, attention, executive function and language), as well as mood. Assessments occur at baseline, post-treatment and 3-month follow-up. Safety outcomes, specifically the number of adverse events related to iTBS, will be monitored and recorded throughout the trial. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the China Rehabilitation Research Center. The results of this study will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals and disseminated at academic conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05953415.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionStrokeStroke RehabilitationTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAdultAgedChinaDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFrontal LobeHumansMaleMiddle AgedParietal LobeProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicCognitionRandomised Controlled TrialSTROKE MEDICINETranscranial Magnetic Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID41397743
PMCPMC12706232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.