ArticleBMJ open2025
Multilayer low-stretch bandage combined with conventional rehabilitation to promote functional recovery after knee surgery: study protocol for a prospective, single-blind, randomised controlled trial.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPatients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and patellar fracture frequently present with substantial pain, swelling and inflammation. These pathophysiological changes not only intensify postoperative pain but also compromise the intra-articular environment via mechanical compression and localised microcirculatory deficits, thereby impeding recovery. Conventional interventions for postoperative swelling, such as cryotherapy and physical agent modalities, are commonly applied yet exhibit limited efficacy. Multilayer low-stretch bandage (MLB), with its gradient compression properties, has recently demonstrated superior swelling control and functional restoration; however, existing research primarily assesses short-term outcomes and lacks a systematic analysis across the postoperative continuum-acute, subacute and chronic phases-as well as long-term follow-up. This study therefore employs a multi-temporal intervention design and extended follow-up to evaluate the effectiveness of MLB in managing swelling, modulating pain and enhancing long-term knee function and activities of daily living across different recovery stages. The findings aim to furnish high-level evidence for knee rehabilitation protocols, refine clinical practice and ultimately improve patient quality of life. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This prospective, single-blind, randomised controlled trial will enrol 36 patients following ACLR and patellar fracture. Participants will be allocated at a 1:1 ratio through computerised randomisation to either an experimental group receiving MLB plus conventional rehabilitation, or a control group receiving conventional rehabilitation alone. The study spans 12 weeks, with follow-up assessments scheduled at baseline (T0), 4 weeks (T1), 8 weeks (T2) and 12 weeks (T3). Outcome measures comprise the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) Knee Rating Score, affected limb oedema regression rate, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain score, knee range of motion, quadriceps and hamstring muscle strength, centre of pressure (COP) displacement parameters, proprioceptive testing, the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and the Holden Walking Function Classification. A subsequent 1-year follow-up will assess long-term efficacy and patient satisfaction, while adverse events are strictly monitored throughout the entire study period. Adherence to Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials guidelines is maintained, and a single-blind design ensures that both participants and assessors remain unaware of group assignments. This trial aims to establish an evidence-based foundation for optimising postoperative rehabilitation in this patient population. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Medical Ethics Committee of Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School (2025-0141-01). The results of the study will be published in a peer-reviewed medical journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov chiCTR2500100566. Registration date is 10 April 2025.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.