ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2026
Heterogeneity in Lumbar Segmental Bone Mineral Density and Age-Related Evolution of Whole-Body Bone Mineral Density: Comprehensive Implications for Osteoporosis Risk Assessment.
Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to analyze the bone mineral density (BMD) in various body regions, investigate the effects of age and sex on BMD, and characterize BMD variations among different lumbar segments (L1-L4). Thereby uncovering patterns of regional bone loss, quantifying heterogeneity risks, and dynamically tracking individual trajectories.
methodsBMD was measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Patients were stratified to analyze the effects of age and sex on BMD at the following sites: lumbar spine (L1-L4); femur: Ward's triangle, greater trochanter, femoral shaft, femoral neck, upper femoral neck, and lower femoral neck; and head, ribs, and pelvis. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on age, BMD Z-scores, BMD T-scores, and body mass index (BMI) to compare lumbar segmental BMD (L1-L4) between the sexes. The study conducted from 2019 to 2024 included lumbar spine data from 20,199 patients; femur data from 23,218 patients; and head, ribs, and pelvis data from 1288 patients.
resultsIn males, the BMD at the femoral Ward's triangle, femoral shaft, and femoral neck (including the upper and lower regions) began to decline from 45 to 49 years of age. The BMD of the femoral greater trochanter decreased at 50-54 years of age. The head BMD in males decreased at 55-59 years of age. The rib BMD showed no significant age-related changes, though the pelvic BMD decreased at 60-64 years. In females, the head, femoral greater trochanter, and femoral shaft BMD decreased at 45-49 years of age. In male patients aged 50-89 years and female patients aged 40-89 years, male and female patients in the Z > -2.0 group, male and female patients in the BMD T-score stratification groups, male patients with a BMI < 30 kg/m
conclusionThe BMDs of several body regions are associated with age and sex, with variations in the rate of change, age at first change, and age-related trends depending on the anatomical site and sex. Heterogeneity exists among the lumbar segments, as the BMDs of L1 and L2 are generally significantly lower than those of L3 and L4; however, this trend varies in specific subgroups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.