Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41397687›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2025

Tailoring mHealth for Healthy Aging: Focus Group Study With Retirement-Age Adults.

Paula Collazo-Castiñeira, Rocío Rodríguez-Rey, Alfonso J Cruz-Jentoft, Somaya Ben Allouch, Doris Eglseer, Josje Schoufour, Eva Topinková, Peter J M Weijs, Yves Boirie, Macarena Sánchez-Izquierdo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Paula Collazo-CastiñeiraDepartment of Psychology, Comillas Pontifical University, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0543-1822
Rocío Rodríguez-ReyDepartment of Psychology, Comillas Pontifical University, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8006-5012
Alfonso J Cruz-JentoftServicio de Geriatría, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal (Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria), Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7628-4861
Somaya Ben AllouchInformatics Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3502-4016
Doris EglseerInstitute of Nursing Science, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-9739-7555
Josje SchoufourDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Health, Sport and Physical Activity, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2150-4684
Eva TopinkováDepartment of Geriatrics and Internal Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-6786-4116
Peter J M WeijsDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Health, Sport and Physical Activity, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8281-0426
Yves BoirieClinical Nutrition Department, University Hospital Centre, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3999-1599
Macarena Sánchez-IzquierdoDepartment of Psychology, Comillas Pontifical University, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6444-0545

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe adoption of mobile health (mHealth) technologies among older adults remains significantly lower than in younger populations, despite their potential to promote healthier lifestyles and mitigate age-related health risks.

objectiveThis study aims to explore the perspectives of retirement-age adults on mHealth interventions, identifying factors that influence their adoption, such as persuasive elements in the app design and psychological techniques.

methodsA qualitative focus group study was conducted with 19 Spanish participants recruited from urban community settings in Madrid, Spain (mean age 61.5 years; 15/19, 79% women). Participants discussed their attitudes, barriers, and preferences for mHealth tools. Focus groups were recorded, transcribed, and coded using an iterative process to ensure rigorous data analysis. An abductive approach was followed, using the persuasive design principles framework and the behavior change techniques' taxonomy, and representing any theme outside those frameworks.

resultsParticipants expressed generally positive attitudes toward mHealth tools, favoring intuitive, user-friendly designs that are minimally time-demanding. However, significant barriers also emerged, such as low digital literacy and concerns about technology dependence. Key design preferences (persuasive design principles) and psychological techniques (behavior change techniques) were deemed beneficial, with preferred features such as tailored and meaningful goal-setting, self-monitoring, positive feedback (eg, congratulating messages after achieving a goal; social rewards), and a moderated use of notifications and prompts. Participants also stressed the importance of age-appropriate recommendations (eg, suggested diets for their age and characteristics) and design (eg, accessible, easy-to-use interfaces and human-like communication). Additionally, some preferences appeared to be culturally grounded (eg, rejection of anglicisms and the desire for locally relevant content, such as suggested activities specific to Madrid). Social support mechanisms, such as group activities and peer interactions through mHealth, were seen as critical for fostering motivation and engagement.

conclusionsmHealth interventions for this population should offer accessible and easy-to-use interfaces along with initial tutorials, facilitating an easy onboarding to overcome low digital literacy, thereby enhancing both usability and initial adoption. Furthermore, by providing meaningful, tailored content (eg, personalized diets and goals) and social features that foster peer connection (eg, user chats or organized activities), these tools may better support sustained engagement over time.

Indexed as

Healthy AgingRetirementAgedFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSpainTelemedicinebehavior change techniquesdigital healthdigital literacyeHealthmHealtholder adultspersuasive designretirementsocial supporttechnology acceptancetelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID41397687
PMCPMC12750076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.