Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41397287›Full record

Trial reportBlood2026

Asciminib demonstrates superior efficacy and safety in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in the ASC4FIRST trial.

Jorge E Cortes, Timothy P Hughes, Jianxiang Wang, Dong-Wook Kim, Dennis Dong Hwan Kim, Jiri Mayer, Yeow-Tee Goh, Philipp le Coutre, Gabriel Etienne, Inho Kim and 11 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Blood, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04971226 (A Phase III, Multi-center, Open-label, Randomized Study of Oral Asciminib Versus Investigator Selected TKI in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Philadelphia Chromosome Positive Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in Chronic Phase), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04971226 phase3active not recruitingnot on this map

A Phase III, Multi-center, Open-label, Randomized Study of Oral Asciminib Versus Investigator Selected TKI in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Philadelphia Chromosome Positive Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in Chronic Phase

TypeinterventionalSponsorNovartis PharmaceuticalsRan2021 to 2031Enrolled405ConditionsChronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) Philadelphia Chromosome PositiveArmsImatinib, Nilotinib, Bosutinib, Dasatinib, Asciminib
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Jorge E CortesDepartment of Medicine, Georgia Cancer Center at Augusta University, Augusta, GA.ORCID 0000-0002-8636-1071
Timothy P HughesPrecision Cancer Medicine Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute and University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0910-3730
Jianxiang WangState Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9437-9151
Dong-Wook KimDepartment of Hematology, Uijeongbu Eulji Medical Center, Uijeongbu-si, Republic of Korea.
Dennis Dong Hwan KimDepartment of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2640-4911
Jiri MayerDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Brno and Masaryk University Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-0567-9887
Yeow-Tee GohDepartment of Hematology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-7069-0997
Philipp le CoutreDepartment of Oncology and Hematology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Gabriel EtienneHematology Department, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7600-4954
Inho KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Biomedical Research Institute, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
David J AndorskyRocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Boulder, CO.ORCID 0000-0002-5699-4644
Felice BombaciCML Patients Group, CML Advocates Network, Turin, Italy.ORCID 0009-0000-1906-1768
Ghayas C IssaDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.ORCID 0000-0002-4339-8683
Naoto TakahashiDepartment of Hematology, Akita University, Akita City, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6758-3787
Shruti KapoorNovartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ.
Rajendra JinwalNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Kamel MalekNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Tracey McCullochNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Lillian YauNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4134-1242
Richard A LarsonDepartment of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.ORCID 0000-0001-9168-3203
Andreas HochhausDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0626-0834

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractMany patients receiving frontline tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP) experience inadequate disease control and/or adverse events (AEs) that impair quality of life. Treatments offering optimal efficacy, safety, and tolerability will support long-term therapy. In the primary analysis from the ASC4FIRST trial, a phase 3 randomized trial comparing asciminib with investigator-selected TKIs (IS-TKIs) in newly diagnosed CML-CP, asciminib demonstrated superior efficacy vs all IS-TKIs and vs imatinib in the imatinib stratum, meeting both primary objectives. In the secondary analysis (2.2 years' median follow-up), major molecular response (MMR) rate at week 96 was 74.1% with asciminib vs 52.0% with IS-TKIs (treatment difference, 22.4% [95% confidence interval (CI), 13.6-31.3]; 1-sided P< .001) and 76.2% with asciminib vs 47.1% with imatinib in the imatinib stratum (treatment difference, 29.7% [95% CI, 17.6-41.8]; 1-sided P< .001), meeting both key secondary objectives. MMR rate was 72.0% with asciminib vs 56.9% with second-generation (2G) TKIs (treatment difference, 15.1% [95% CI, 2.3-28.0]; 1-sided P< .05), suggesting possible clinical benefit, although the study was not designed to formally confirm statistical significance for this secondary end point. Safety/tolerability remained favorable with asciminib vs IS-TKIs. Dose reductions and interruptions, respectively, occurred with asciminib (18.5%; 46.5%), imatinib (23.2%; 47.5%), and 2G TKIs (54.9%; 63.7%). The hazard ratio for time to discontinuation of treatment due to AEs for asciminib vs 2G TKIs was 0.46 (95% CI, 0.215-0.997). With longer follow-up, asciminib continued to demonstrate a favorable benefit-risk profile over IS-TKIs and imatinib, supporting its potential as a treatment option for newly diagnosed CML-CP. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT04971226.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsLeukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL PositiveProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrazolesAdultAgedFemaleHumansImatinib MesylateMaleMiddle AgedNiacinamideTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAntineoplastic AgentsasciminibImatinib MesylateNiacinamideProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrazoles

Identifiers

PMID41397287
PMCPMC13123421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.