Trial reportBlood2026
Asciminib demonstrates superior efficacy and safety in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in the ASC4FIRST trial.
Trial report in Blood, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04971226 (A Phase III, Multi-center, Open-label, Randomized Study of Oral Asciminib Versus Investigator Selected TKI in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Philadelphia Chromosome Positive Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in Chronic Phase), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase III, Multi-center, Open-label, Randomized Study of Oral Asciminib Versus Investigator Selected TKI in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Philadelphia Chromosome Positive Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in Chronic Phase
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Tyrosine kinase inhibitors for chronic myeloid leukemia: a landscape analysis of global clinical trials based on public registries.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Trial
- Matching-adjusted indirect comparison between asciminib and flumatinib as first-line treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia in China.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Asciminib as first-line therapy in chronic myeloid leukemia: a systematic review.Blood research · 2026Review
- Article
- Management of chronic myeloid leukemia with tyrosine kinase inhibitors: adverse events, toxicities and therapy dosing.Haematologica · 2026Review
- Dual functional genomics reveals a broad and convergent landscape of asciminib resistance in BCR::ABL1.Genome medicine · 2026Article
- Four Decades of Molecular Innovation in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: From Antisense Targeting to Treatment-Free Remission.Cancers · 2026Review
- From fatal disease to functional cure: 25 years of tyrosine kinase inhibition in chronic myeloid leukemia.Leukemia · 2026Review
- Chronic myeloid leukemia: incorporation of recent advances into current treatment algorithms.Blood cancer journal · 2026Review
- Integrating Asciminib into the Evolving Treatment Landscape of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: A Canadian Perspective.Journal of blood medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractMany patients receiving frontline tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP) experience inadequate disease control and/or adverse events (AEs) that impair quality of life. Treatments offering optimal efficacy, safety, and tolerability will support long-term therapy. In the primary analysis from the ASC4FIRST trial, a phase 3 randomized trial comparing asciminib with investigator-selected TKIs (IS-TKIs) in newly diagnosed CML-CP, asciminib demonstrated superior efficacy vs all IS-TKIs and vs imatinib in the imatinib stratum, meeting both primary objectives. In the secondary analysis (2.2 years' median follow-up), major molecular response (MMR) rate at week 96 was 74.1% with asciminib vs 52.0% with IS-TKIs (treatment difference, 22.4% [95% confidence interval (CI), 13.6-31.3]; 1-sided P< .001) and 76.2% with asciminib vs 47.1% with imatinib in the imatinib stratum (treatment difference, 29.7% [95% CI, 17.6-41.8]; 1-sided P< .001), meeting both key secondary objectives. MMR rate was 72.0% with asciminib vs 56.9% with second-generation (2G) TKIs (treatment difference, 15.1% [95% CI, 2.3-28.0]; 1-sided P< .05), suggesting possible clinical benefit, although the study was not designed to formally confirm statistical significance for this secondary end point. Safety/tolerability remained favorable with asciminib vs IS-TKIs. Dose reductions and interruptions, respectively, occurred with asciminib (18.5%; 46.5%), imatinib (23.2%; 47.5%), and 2G TKIs (54.9%; 63.7%). The hazard ratio for time to discontinuation of treatment due to AEs for asciminib vs 2G TKIs was 0.46 (95% CI, 0.215-0.997). With longer follow-up, asciminib continued to demonstrate a favorable benefit-risk profile over IS-TKIs and imatinib, supporting its potential as a treatment option for newly diagnosed CML-CP. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT04971226.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.