Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41397248›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2025

The Role of Practitioner- and User-Set Goals in Engagement and Psychological Distress Among Kooth Digital Health Users: Retrospective Analysis.

Jacqlyn Yourell, Jennifer Huberty, Terry Hanley, Louisa Salhi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jacqlyn YourellFit Minded Inc., Phoenix, AZ, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2958-1411
Jennifer HubertyFit Minded Inc., Phoenix, AZ, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0276-4640
Terry HanleyUniversity of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5861-9170
Louisa SalhiUniversity of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6458-1391

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundYouth and young adult mental health concerns are rising globally, with digital mental health platforms offering a promising solution for accessible support. Among the various features these platforms provide, goal setting and achievement have been shown to positively influence behavior change and mental health outcomes. However, there is limited understanding of how user-set goals compare to those set collaboratively with a practitioner regarding their impact on user engagement and mental health outcomes in digital mental health platforms.

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between various goal-related variables (eg, the number of goals created and progress in user-set and practitioner-set goals) and user engagement as well as mental health (ie, psychological distress) on a free digital mental health platform. A secondary exploratory aim was to assess how different user-presenting issues were associated with platform engagement.

methodsWe leveraged secondary data from a free, web-based mental health platform for youth aged 10 to 25 years in the United Kingdom that offers goal-setting features, emotional journaling, peer support, asynchronous chat with practitioners, and various self-guided well-being activities. Data included in the analyses were from youth and young adults (mean age 15.84 years, SD 2.88; 522/691, 75.5% female) who engaged with the goal-setting feature and completed both pre- and postengagement psychological distress measures between January 2020 and December 2023. We examined the relationship between user-set goals and practitioner-set goals on user engagement and psychological distress via linear regressions. The impact of different user-presenting issues on engagement was also explored via linear regression.

resultsThe number of practitioner-set goals created was positively associated with platform engagement (β=.16; P<.001), whereas the number of self-set goals and goal progress, whether self or practitioner set, were not. Progress on practitioner-set goals was significantly associated with reduced psychological distress (β=-.27; P<.001), while progress on self-set goals showed no significant association (P=.16). Physical health-related and school-related presenting issues were the strongest predictors of increased platform engagement (β=.21; P<.001 and β=.17; P<.001, respectively).

conclusionsThese findings underscore the importance of collaborative goal setting in improving mental health outcomes for youth and young adults on digital mental health platforms. By highlighting the role of guided support and goal progression, this study enhances our understanding of how digital mental health platforms can better support young people's mental health and well-being. This paper also highlights how digital mental health platforms can serve as a valuable resource for addressing a wide range of mental health needs.

Indexed as

GoalsPsychological DistressAdolescentAdultChildDigital HealthFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesTelemedicineUnited KingdomYoung Adultdigital mental healthgoal settingmental healthpractitionerpsychological distressyoung adultsyouth

Identifiers

PMID41397248
PMCPMC12750070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.