Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41397131›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

The variability of evolvability: Properties of dynamic fitness landscapes determine how phenotypic variability evolves.

Csenge Petak, Lapo Frati, Renske M A Vroomans, Melissa H Pespeni, Nick Cheney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Deconstructing empirical fitness seascapes across scales of granularity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. The variability of evolvability: Properties of dynamic fitness landscapes determine how phenotypic variability evolves.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Csenge PetakDepartment of Biology, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405.ORCID 0000-0003-2715-8759
Lapo FratiDepartment of Computer Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405.
Renske M A VroomansThe Sainsbury Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1LR, United Kingdom.
Melissa H Pespeni *Department of Biology, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405.ORCID 0000-0001-5447-6678
Nick Cheney *Department of Computer Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405.ORCID 0000-0002-7140-2213

Funding

National Science Foundation (NSF) 1943316National Science Foundation (NSF) 2218063
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The magnitude and shape of phenotypic variation depends on properties of the genotype-to-phenotype (GP) map, which itself can evolve over time. The evolution of GP maps is particularly interesting in variable environments, as GP maps can evolve to bias variation in the direction of past selection, increasing the evolvability of the population over time. However, the degree and manner in which environmental variation shapes GP maps and influences evolutionary dynamics may depend on properties of the fitness landscape. To explore how evolutionary dynamics are affected by variable environments across a wide range of different pairs of fitness landscapes, we evolved GP maps to produce spatial-temporal gene expression patterns that matched two-dimensional patterns generated by different elementary cellular automata rules. We found remarkable variation in how populations evolved in variable environments. In some cases, changing the environment helped populations find higher fitness peaks; in others, it hindered them. The evolution of evolvability also depended on the fitness landscape pair. In some experiments, the ability to generate adaptive phenotypic variation upon environment change increased over time, while in some others, populations found shared areas between fitness landscapes. On the other hand, environmental variability consistently resulted in higher fitness landscape exploration, average fitness, and mutational robustness compared to evolution in static environments, which we hypothesize are tightly connected. In conclusion, work presented here sheds light on important general consequences of environmental variability, while also demonstrating dependency on properties of fitness landscapes, which future research on the evolution of evolvability should consider.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionGenetic FitnessPhenotypeGenetic VariationGenotypeModels, GeneticSelection, Geneticenvironment variabilityevo-devoevolvabilitygene regulatory networkrobustness

Identifiers

PMID41397131
PMCPMC12745803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.