ArticleJMIR human factors2025
Internet-Based Mental Health Intervention for Depressive Symptoms in Young Adults: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Article in JMIR human factors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) provides psychological interventions to individuals with mild depressive symptoms. Objective: This study aimed to examine the potential cost-effectiveness of internet-based guided-CBT in university students with mild depressive symptoms from the perspective of service providers in Hong Kong. Methods: The outcomes of low-intensity guided internet-based CBT and in-person CBT in a hypothetical cohort of university students with mild depressive symptoms were examined using a 5-year decision-analytic model. Model inputs were obtained from published literature and local data. Model outcomes included direct medical cost, school dropouts, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Sensitivity analyses were conducted on all model parameters. Results: Compared to the in-person group, the internet group gained higher QALYs by 0.0211 QALYs, lowered school dropouts by 0.052%, and saved US $249 in the base-case analysis. In one-way sensitivity analysis, the internet group gained higher QALYs at a lower cost than the in-person group throughout the variation of all model inputs. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that the internet group was cost-effective (at willingness-to-pay threshold was US $48,119/QALY) in 99.7% of the 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations. Conclusions: Internet-based CBT appears to be the cost-effective option when compared to in-person CBT for university students with mild depressive symptoms from the perspective of service providers in Hong Kong.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.