ArticlePloS one2025
Hybrid machine learning models for enhanced arrhythmia detection from ECG signals using autoencoder and convolution features.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning-based fetal health prediction and development of smart web application.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Privacy-preserving adaptive arrhythmia monitoring with wearable ECG, smartphone PPG, and federated on-device learning.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Automated arrhythmia detection from electrocardiogram (ECG) signals is crucial and important for the early treatment of cardiac disease (CD). In this investigation, eight machine-learning models have been developed to identify improved ECG arrhythmia detection using two standard datasets (MIT-BIH Arrhythmia and the ECG 5000). In the first phase, two types of feature extraction schemes (autoencoder) and (Convolution) are used to obtain relevant features from ECG samples and subsequently, eight ML models are successfully trained and tested to find various performance matrices through simulation-based experiments. Then, the TOPSIS and mRMR ranking schemes are used to rank the ML models and identify the three best-performing models recommended for real-time arrhythmia detection. In this study, it is observed that for the same number of input features, models based on autoencoder features offer enhanced performance compared to those based on convolutional features. It is generally observed that the top identified hybrid model, Autoencoder Features with Neural Network (AEFNN) on the MIT-BIH dataset, achieves an accuracy of 97.96% and on the ECG5000 dataset, the hybrid model achieves an accuracy of 99.20%. This proposed model can be utilized for the early detection of arrhythmia, particularly in large-scale healthcare screening programs, thereby aiding in timely diagnosis and intervention. In this study, two types of features are used to model development in future work. Other relevant important features can be extracted from ECG samples, and those features can be used to develop accurate models to identify Heart disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.