ArticlePloS one2025
A multi-factor dynamic time series measure for stock correlation analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Existing similarity measures in stock correlation analysis often overlook the multidimensional nature of stock data and the dynamics of the time-lag effect (TLE) in phase differences. To address these limitations, this paper proposes a novel method, called Multi-Factor Dynamic Temporal Similarity Measure (MFDTSM). The method introduces an enhanced eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model based on Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to comprehensively evaluate the influence of stock factors. The proposed method effectively categorizes stocks and reveals the heterogeneity of factor influence by clustering the SHAP values of stock factors. Furthermore, MFDTSM is able to successfully quantify the dynamic rate of phase differences in TLE by constructing the cumulative distance matrix and analyzing the optimal alignment paths of time series data, thereby significantly improving the accuracy of the similarity measure. Empirical analysis is performed using 102 stocks from the communication and financial industries, including 12 key stock factors. The experimental results demonstrate that MFDTSM improves the accuracy of the analysis of industry correlation, linear correlation, and stock correlation pricing by 10%, 16%, and 5%, respectively, over existing methods, which highlight the efficiency and stability of MFDTSM in analyzing complex stock market dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.