ArticlePLOS global public health2025
Prospective cohort study evaluating feasibility, acceptability, and clinical impact of diabetes self-management education in a PEN-Plus program in Southeastern Liberia.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
People living with insulin dependent diabetes (PLWIDD) in low and lower-middle income countries (LLMICs), specifically rural areas, face significant barriers to diabetes management. Diabetes Self-Management Education (DSME) is an evidence-based intervention to educate and empower people living with diabetes to improve self-management. This pilot study evaluates the feasibility and clinical impact of a DSME program in a rural Package of Essential Noncommunicable Disease-Plus (PEN-Plus) clinic in Liberia. This study was conducted at two sites in Harper, Liberia. After being trained on how to administer DSME, clinic providers delivered DSME to PLWIDD during routine monthly clinic visits. Primary outcomes included acceptability, adoption, fidelity and the frequency of self-management behaviors; secondary outcomes included knowledge change and Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). Three providers and twenty-six PLWIDD were enrolled. DSME was feasible and well accepted by providers and PLWIDD. Patient knowledge scores increased from 33% at baseline to 64.6% at month 12. Average weekly blood glucose checks increased from 4.0 (95% CI 1.93, 6.23) checks per week month one, to 7.2 (95% CI 3.56, 10.79) checks per week month 12. Average weekly missed insulin injections decreased from 3.9 (95% CI 2.51, 6.03) in month one, to 0.82 (95% CI -0.14, 1.79) in month 12. Mean HBA1C decreased from 12.0% (107.7 mmol/mol) at baseline to 10.9% (95.6 mmol/mol) month 12, (modeled mean reduction of 1.1%,95% CI 0.0 to 2.0). This study adds to the growing body of literature showing that DSME can address many barriers faced by PLWIDD in LLMICs. Further research is warranted to expand the scope of self-management education to other noncommunicable conditions in the context of integrated PEN-Plus strategies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.