Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41396976›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

A large-scale trial in Chennai, India shows effective reduction of Anopheles stephensi populations by the biolarvicide Natular.

Candasamy Sadanandane, Ananganallur Nagarajan Shriram, Ashwani Kumar, Mariapillai Kalimuthu, Ranganathan Krishnamoorthi, S Selvakumar, Annamalai Sakthivel, Manju Rahi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Candasamy SadanandaneDepartment of Health Research, ICMR-Vector Control Research Centre, Indian Council of Medical Research, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, Puducherry, India.
Ananganallur Nagarajan ShriramDepartment of Health Research, ICMR-Vector Control Research Centre, Indian Council of Medical Research, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, Puducherry, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0996-2447
Ashwani KumarDepartment of Health Research, ICMR-Vector Control Research Centre, Indian Council of Medical Research, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, Puducherry, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2485-7581
Mariapillai KalimuthuDepartment of Health Research, ICMR-Vector Control Research Centre, Indian Council of Medical Research, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Ranganathan KrishnamoorthiDepartment of Health Research, ICMR-Vector Control Research Centre, Indian Council of Medical Research, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, Puducherry, India.
S SelvakumarGreater Chennai Corporation, Government of Tamil Nadu, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Annamalai SakthivelDepartment of Health Research, ICMR-Vector Control Research Centre, Indian Council of Medical Research, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, Puducherry, India.
Manju RahiDepartment of Health Research, ICMR-Vector Control Research Centre, Indian Council of Medical Research, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, Puducherry, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biolarvicides present an environmentally safer alternative to chemical larvicides, demonstrating selectivity against target species. However, the available options for biolarvicide use in mosquito control remain limited. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of three formulations of the biolarvicide Natular, namely the 20.6% Emulsifiable Concentrate (EC), 2.5% G30 granular, and 7.48% tablet (DT) for direct application, against Anopheles stephensi in large-scale field trials conducted in Chennai, India. When the 7.48% DT formulation was applied at a rate of 1 tablet per 200 L in overhead tanks with An. stephensi breeding sites, on an average, led to a > 90-100% reduction in An. stephensi larval and pupal density for a duration of 8-9 weeks in rainy, winter and summer seasons. Similarly, the 2.5% G30 formulation, at a concentration of 0.074 mg (AI)/L in overhead tanks, impressively suppressed An. stephensi larval and pupal density by 91-100% for 4-5 weeks in three seasons. The application of the 20.6% EC formulation at 0.073 mg (AI)/L in overhead tanks achieved a remarkable 100% reduction in larval and pupal density for 2 weeks in all seasons. The Natular 7.48% DT formulation is well-suited for An. stephensi larval control at 1 tablet per 200 L with an 8-week application interval. The 2.5% G30 formulation is recommended at 0.074 mg (AI)/L at 4-week intervals. Meanwhile, the 20.6% EC formulation can effectively control An. stephensi at 0.073 mg (AI)/L with fortnightly application intervals. These Natular formulations serve as potent biolarvicides, offering a valuable tool for An. stephensi control within the Integrated Vector Management (IVM) program.

Indexed as

AnophelesInsecticidesMosquito ControlAnimalsIndiaLarvaPupaSeasonsInsecticides

Identifiers

PMID41396976
PMCPMC12704891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.