Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41396970›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

PRCnet: An efficient model for automatic detection of brain tumor in MRI images.

Ahmeed Suliman Farhan, Muhammad Khalid, Umar Manzoor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ahmeed Suliman FarhanElectronic Computer Center, University of Anbar, Ramadi, Iraq.ORCID 0000-0001-7159-190X
Muhammad KhalidSchool of Computer Sciences, University of Hull, Kingston upon Hull, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2674-2489
Umar ManzoorSchool of Engineering, Computing and Mathematical Sciences, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain tumors are the most prevalent and life-threatening cancer; an early and accurate diagnosis of brain tumors increases the chances of patient survival and treatment planning. However, manual tumor detection is a complex, cumbersome and time-consuming task and is prone to errors, which relies on the radiologist's experience. As a result, the development of an accurate and automatic tumor detection system is critical. In this paper, we proposed a new model called Parallel Residual Convolutional Network (PRCnet) model to classify brain tumors from Magnetic Resonance Imaging. The PCRnet model uses several techniques (such as filters of different sizes with parallel layers, connections between layers, batch normalization layer, and ReLU) and dropout layer to overcome the over-fitting problem, for achieving accurate and automatic classification of brain tumors. Our methodology used data augmentation techniques such as rotation, flipping, and scaling. These enhanced the diversity and quantity of the training dataset, contributing significantly to the model's improved performance. The PRCnet model is trained and tested on two different datasets and obtained an accuracy of 94.77% and 97.1% for dataset A and dataset B, respectively which is way better as compared to the state-of-the-art models. Our PRCnet code publicly available at: https://github.com/Ahmeed-Suliman-Farhan/PRCnet-Model.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsHumans

Identifiers

PMID41396970
PMCPMC12704845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.