ArticleThe oncologist2025
Real-world outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitors in people with HIV and skin cancer: a multicentre study.
Article in The oncologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPeople living with HIV (PWH) have an increased risk of developing aggressive skin cancers, yet they have been largely excluded from immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) trials. Consequently, evidence on the safety and efficacy of ICIs in this population remains scarce, particularly for the nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO+IPI) combination.
methodsThis multicentre, real-world study included PWH treated with ICIs for melanoma or non-melanoma skin cancers. The objective was to evaluate patient characteristics, treatment management, and clinical outcomes across the different skin cancer types.
resultsAmong the 54 patients, 89% were male, and 92.6% had a suppressed HIV viral load. Melanoma was the most frequent tumour (35/54, 64.8%), followed by cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (12/54, 22.2%), Kaposi sarcoma (4/54, 7.4%), basal cell carcinoma (2/54, 3.7%), and one Merkel cell carcinoma. Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy was given as first-line treatment in 81.5% (44/54). Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) occurred in 42.6% (23/54), with a median onset of 43.5 days (IQR, 20.5-126). The maximum toxicity grade was 1/2 in 39% (21/54), grade ≥ 3 in 13% (7/54). Seventeen melanoma patients received NIVO+IPI. Among them, 64.7% (11/17) experienced irAEs, including grade ≥ 3 events in 30% (5/17). Objective response rates were 43% (9/21) in melanoma, 58% (7/12) in cSCC, and 75% (3/4) in Kaposi sarcoma.
conclusionsPWH treated with ICIs for skin cancer demonstrated favourable outcomes, with a notably reassuring safety profile of NIVO+IPI. These findings support managing well-controlled PWH similarly to the general population and highlight the importance of including this population across all settings of skin cancer trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.