ArticleIntensive care medicine experimental2025
The role of transcranial Doppler in predicting the incidence and prognosis of sepsis-associated encephalopathy.
Article in Intensive care medicine experimental, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bibliometric analysis of transcranial Doppler ultrasound.Medicine · 2026Review
- ARISE framework: a temporal, multi-organ view of perfusion in sepsis.Internal and emergency medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSepsis-associated encephalopathy (SAE) is a common complication of sepsis, contributing to poor outcomes and increased mortality. Early detection remains challenging due to the absence of observable direct brain injury. Transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasonography provides a non-invasive, bedside tool for assessing cerebral hemodynamics and may help identify patients at risk. SAE was defined as new-onset delirium (positive CAM-ICU) or unexplained coma (GCS < 8) not attributable to structural or metabolic causes. This study aimed to evaluate the role of TCD in predicting the incidence and prognosis of SAE in septic patients admitted to the ICU.
methodsThis prospective cohort study included 93 patients with sepsis. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were recorded upon admission. Daily TCD was performed for seven consecutive days to measure the pulsatility index (PI) and resistive index (RI). Neurological dysfunction was assessed daily using the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU) and the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS).
resultsA total of 93 patients were included, of whom 44 (47.3%) developed SAE. SAE patients showed greater illness severity, with higher median SOFA (6 [5-7] vs. 5 [3-6], p < 0.001) and APACHE II (14 [12-17] vs. 11 [9-14], p < 0.001) scores, and higher 28-day mortality (61.4% vs. 22.4%, p < 0.001). The median PI and RI were consistently higher in SAE patients across all study days, while the mean flow velocity (mFV) was lower. PI on day 1 had the best accuracy for predicting SAE, with a cutoff ≥ 1.30 (AUC: 0.963, sensitivity 95.45%, specificity 100%). RI on day 3 was also highly predictive (AUC: 0.971, cutoff ≥ 0.67, sensitivity 95.45%, specificity 95.92%).
conclusionsIn this sample of septic patients, PI and RI are strong predictors of SAE, with PI serving as a reliable early indicator of both SAE and mortality. Trial Preregistration The study was registered in the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry: PACTR202410707982429, date: 7/10/2024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.