ReviewCurrent pain and headache reports2025
Efficacy and Emerging Role of Erector Spinae Plane Block for Pain Management during Labor.
Review in Current pain and headache reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThe erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has emerged as a novel regional anesthesia technique for managing pain during labor, providing an effective alternative to traditional methods. The present investigation evaluates efficacy and safety as well as maternal satisfaction in labor pain management. RECENT
findingsA comprehensive analysis of patients receiving ESPB was conducted, comparing outcomes to those receiving standard analgesia, such as epidural anesthesia. Results show that the ESPB provided significant pain relief during labor, with comparable or superior efficacy to traditional methods. Patients reported high levels of satisfaction due to the minimally invasive nature of the procedure and its favorable side effect profile, including reduced motor blockade and improved mobility during labor. The ESPB was also associated with a lower risk of complications, such as hypotension, commonly observed with epidural techniques. Furthermore, the technique's simplicity and versatility make it an attractive option for obstetric anesthesia providers, particularly in settings where epidural placement may be contraindicated or those with limited resources. This study explores the importance of exploring alternative pain management strategies that prioritize maternal comfort, safety, and overall labor experience. By reducing pain effectively while maintaining maternal mobility and minimizing adverse effects, the ESPB offers a patient-centered approach to labor analgesia. Future research should focus on optimizing regimens and long-term outcomes for both mothers and neonates. The findings support ESPB as a valuable addition to the arsenal of pain management options during labor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41396543What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.