Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41396494›Full record

ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2025

Olfactory processing in gifted and non-gifted children: assessing the sniffin' sticks olfactory test for threshold, discrimination, and identification abilities.

Oguzhan Ekici, Hasan Ege, Muhammed Ciftci, Abdulkadir Muhammed Memduh Fakirullahoglu, Gafur Rakici, Gonul Simsek, Nermin Yelmen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Oguzhan EkiciDepartment of Physiology, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0845-5443
Hasan EgeDepartment of Physiology, School of Medicine, Istanbul Arel University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0547-8826
Muhammed CiftciMinistry of National Education, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3349-6159
Abdulkadir Muhammed Memduh FakirullahogluMinistry of National Education, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6941-199X
Gafur RakiciDepartment of Physiology, School of Medicine, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4027-1409
Gonul SimsekDepartment of Physiology, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9403-4102
Nermin YelmenDepartment of Physiology, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey. nermink@iuc.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2513-6612

Funding

Istanbul Üniversitesi-Cerrahpasa TSA-2023-37004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntelligence encompasses learning, knowledge application, and problem-solving. Although gifted children typically exhibit high IQ scores, their olfactory abilities have been understudied despite established neuroanatomical links between olfactory processing and intelligence-related brain regions. This study addresses this gap by examining whether gifted children demonstrate superior olfactory function compared with typically developing peers.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted in Istanbul with 102 children aged 8-11 years, comprising gifted children (IQ > 130) and typically developing controls. Olfactory performance was assessed using the standardized Sniffin' Sticks test, measuring odor threshold, odor discrimination, and odor identification. Group comparisons were performed overall and stratified by gender.

resultsGifted children exhibited superior overall olfactory detection compared with typically developing children. Among males, gifted participants had higher odor threshold scores than typically developing males. Among females, gifted participants showed higher odor threshold, direct odor identification, odor identification, and total Sniffin' Sticks scores than their typically developing counterparts.

conclusionsFindings indicate a positive association between intelligence and olfactory function in childhood. Enhanced olfactory abilities in gifted children-observed across threshold, identification, and composite Sniffin' Sticks indices-may reflect broader advantages in cognitive processing linked to high intellectual functioning. Further research should elucidate underlying neural mechanisms and developmental implications.

Indexed as

Child, GiftedDiscrimination, PsychologicalIntelligenceOlfactory PerceptionSensory ThresholdsSmellChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleOdorantsGiftednessIntelligence quotientNeurocognitive processingOlfactionSniffin’ sticks test

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.