Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41396476›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2026

An Industry Perspective on Compassionate Use in Europe: A Call for Change.

Philipp Schlatter, Nina Heiss, Pedro Franco, Annie O'Keefe Martin, Susan Robson, Ramona Reichenbach

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Philipp SchlatterF. Hoffmann - La Roche Ltd., Grenzacherstrasse 124, CH-4070, Basel, Switzerland.
Nina HeissMerck Healthcare KGaA, Frankfurter Str. 250, 64293, Darmstadt, Germany. nina.heiss@merckgroup.com.
Pedro FrancoMerck Healthcare KGaA, Frankfurter Str. 250, 64293, Darmstadt, Germany.
Annie O'Keefe MartinSanofi UK, 410 Thames Valley Park Dr, Earley, Reading, RG6 1PT, UK.
Susan RobsonF. Hoffmann - La Roche Ltd., Grenzacherstrasse 124, CH-4070, Basel, Switzerland.
Ramona ReichenbachNovartis Pharma AG, Lichtstrasse 35, CH-4056, Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOptions for patients to receive unauthorised medicines through compassionate use (CU) in Europe vary greatly. There are two CU pathways: cohort programmes, regulated uniformly by the Regulation across EU member states, and individual patient requests (IPRs) governed by the Directive. The latter allows member states to determine their own laws, resulting in heterogeneous regulatory requirements and challenges in operationalization. Consequently, patients may experience delays in accessing CU medicines depending on their country of residence. To compare CU availability across European countries and formulate recommendations for improvement, we analyzed 8,934 patient requests from 30 European countries.

methodsAn exploratory post-hoc analysis was conducted using pooled collaborative data from 8,934 patient requests provided by Merck KGaA, Novartis, Roche, and Sanofi, tracked from January 1, 2020 to April 30, 2023 across 30 countries. All requests with complete dates for submission, company approval, relevant Ethics Committees or Health Authorities, and shipment dates were included.

resultsWhile internal company CU approval steps were found to be similar with a median approval time of 5 days (median interquartile range (IQR) of 1 (0-6) for cohorts; median IQR 4 (1-8) for IPRs), the time from company approval until shipment varied between cohort requests (median IQR 5 (1-16) days) and IPRs (median IQR 8 (1-22) days). Challenges experienced included differences in the use of CU terminologies, scope, settings, regulatory, and operational requirements.

conclusionOur findings indicate that differing national requirements across Europe lead to operational challenges and inter-country variability in CU implementation posing operational challenges for stakeholders, highlighting the need for improved harmonization.

Indexed as

Cohort programmeCompassionate useEarly access pathwaysEquitable accessEuropean pharmaceutical legislationIndividual patient requestRegulatory harmonizationUnauthorized medicines

Identifiers

PMID41396476
PMCPMC12946237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.