ArticleJournal of vision2025
Spatiotemporal letter processing in visual word recognition uncovered by perceptual oscillations.
Article in Journal of vision, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- The processing of spatial frequencies through time in visual word recognition.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The oscillatory features of visual processing are altered in healthy aging.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite decades of intense study, the spatiotemporal processing of letters in visual word recognition has yet to be elucidated, with the debate largely focusing on whether individual letters are processed serially or in parallel. The present study investigated the processing of individual letters and letter combinations through time in visual word recognition using displays where signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) varied randomly throughout a 200 ms exposure duration. In Experiment 1, SNR varied either homogeneously across all letters or independently for each letter position (cf. heterogeneous sampling). Reading accuracy was substantially greater with homogeneous than heterogeneous sampling. Experiment 2 again used heterogeneous sampling and classification images (CIs) were calculated for individual letter positions or conjunctions thereof, reflecting processing efficiency according to time during target exposure. These CIs or their Fourier transforms were passed to a classifier to assess differences in the result patterns across individual letter positions or their conjunctions. Overall, the present results indicate the following: (1) significant parallel letter processing capacity throughout exposure duration; (2) dissociable processing mechanisms for each letter position; and (3) letter position-specific mechanisms for letter conjunctions that are distinct from those for individual letters. The results also provide evidence relevant to the neural code underlying the perceptual mechanisms that were uncovered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.